Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 25168 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2021
S.A.Nos.78 & 79 of 2003
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.12.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A.Nos.78 & 79 of 2003
and
C.M.P.No.809 of 2003
In S.A.No.78 of 2003
Dhanuskodi ... Appellant/
Appellant/
Plaintiff
Vs.
1.R.Ranganathan
2.G.Ranganathan
3.Petchiammal
4.Ramanuja Konar
5.Kanda Konar ... Respondents/
Respondents/
Defendants
In S.A.No.79 of 2003
S.Ramanuja Konar ... Appellant/
Appellant/
Defendant
Vs.
1.R.Ranganathan
2.G.Ranganathan ... Respondents/
Respondents/
Plaintiffs
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
S.A.Nos.78 & 79 of 2003
PRAYER in S.A.No.78 of 2003 : Second Appeal filed under Section
100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the
learned Additional District Judge, Tuticorin, dated 16.03.1998 in
A.S.No.2 of 1997, confirming the decree and judgment of the Principal
District Munsif Court, Tuticorin, dated 11.03.1996 in O.S.No.373 of
1994.
PRAYER in S.A.No.79 of 2003 : Second Appeal filed under Section
100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the
learned Additional District Judge, Tuticorin, dated 16.03.1998
dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree of the
Additional District Munsif Court, Tuticorin, dated 23.07.1993 in O.S.No.
234 of 1992.
In Both S.A.s
For Appellant : C.Rajesh
For Respondents : M/s.Joshua
for Mr.R.Manimaran
for R1 & R2
JUDGMENT
The appeal was listed on 01.12.2021 and at the request of the
appellant, it was adjourned to 03.12.2021 and thereafter on 06.12.2021,
08.12.2021, 13.12.2021 and on 13.12.2021 it was listed on 20.12.2021
under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, the learned counsel for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.Nos.78 & 79 of 2003
the appellant is not ready to make the submissions. Hence, these second
appeals are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
21.12.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
btr
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
1.The Additional District Judge, Tuticorin.
2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Tuticorin.
3.The Additional District Munsif Court, Tuticorin.
4.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.Nos.78 & 79 of 2003
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
btr
Order made in S.A.Nos.78 & 79 of 2003
Dated:
21.12.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!