Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 25167 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2021
S.A.No.1576 of 2002
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.12.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A.No.1576 of 2002
1.Muniandi
2.Arumugham
3.Kitchirajan
4.Duraisamy
5.Sekar
6.Kannusamy
7.Nagarajan
8.Thirunathan
9.Muniappan
10.Rajamanickam
11.Pattappan
12.Ravi ... Appellants/
Appellants/
Plaintiffs
Vs.
1.State of Tamil Nadu,
Represented by District Collector,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
S.A.No.1576 of 2002
Sivagangai District,
Sivagangai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
R.D.O. Office,
Sivagangai.
3.Raman
4.Raman
5.Ayyanar
6.Muniandi
7.Karuppiah
8.Muthirulan
9.Veeran
10.Manian
11.Manikkalai
12.Muniandi
13.Veeran
14.Ayyanar ... Respondents/
Respondents/
Defendants
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil
Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.23 of 2000,
dated 21.11.2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Sivagangai, confirming
the judgment and decree in O.S.No.115 of 1997, dated 24.09.1999 on the
file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Sivagangai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/5
S.A.No.1576 of 2002
For Appellants : Mr.S.Venkatesan
for Mr.A.Sivaji
For Respondents : Mr.A.Sivanupandian
Government Advocate
for R1 & R2
Mr.K.R.Laxman
for R3, R5, R6 & R7
No appearance for R8 to R13
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a Memo, dated
15.12.2021 to the effect that the suit property has been taken over by the
Government under Uppar Recreation Scheme and they are not interested
in prosecuting the above second appeal to the said effect. The appellants
and the legal heirs of the deceased appellants have also signed the Memo
to the said effect. The Memo of the parties is recorded. Therefore, the
second appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
21.12.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
btr
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.1576 of 2002
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
1.The Sub Court, Sivagangai.
2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Sivagangai.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.1576 of 2002
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
btr
Order made in S.A.No.1576 of 2002
Dated:
21.12.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!