Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 25040 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2021
Tax Case Appeal Nos.591 & 592 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.12.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal Nos. 591 & 592 of 2021
and
C.M.P. No. 20878 of 2021
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai .. Appellant in both TCAs
Versus
C.B. Sujatha .. Respondent in both TCAs
Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order dated 09.06.2006 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Chennai “A” Bench, in I.T.A.Nos. 3227/Mds/04 and 1927/Mds/05.
For Appellant : M/s.V.Pushpa
Junior Standing Counsel in both TCAs
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
These tax case appeals have been filed by the appellant / Revenue,
challenging the order dated 09.06.2006 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.Nos.3227/Mds/04 and 1927/Mds/05,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Tax Case Appeal Nos.591 & 592 of 2021
relating to the assessment years 2002-03 and 2001-02 respectively, by raising the
following substantial question of law:-
“Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the
Tribunal was right in holding that the monthly amount received by
the assessee cannot be treated as family pension, and cannot be
taxed as per the provisions of the Section 57iiia and its
explanation”
2. When the matters were taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department
before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
these appeals is less than the threshold limit.
3. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for
the appellant / Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to be
less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open
the substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4
Tax Case Appeal Nos.591 & 592 of 2021
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q, J.]
20.12.2021
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
dhk
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Madras “A” Bench.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3/4
Tax Case Appeal Nos.591 & 592 of 2021
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
dhk
Tax Case Appeal Nos.591 & 592 of 2021
20.12.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!