Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

E. Kandhan vs M/S.Assured Capital Services
2021 Latest Caselaw 24650 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24650 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2021

Madras High Court
E. Kandhan vs M/S.Assured Capital Services on 15 December, 2021
                                                                             C.S. No.155 of 2021

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED :15.12.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                               C.S. No.155 of 2021

                     1. E. Kandhan
                     2. K.Santhanalakshmi
                     3. K. Yamini
                     4. E. Ramadoss
                     5. R. Vasantha
                     6. S. Udayarekha
                     7. E. Srinivasan
                     8. S. Jothilakshmi                      ...                 Plaintiffs

                                                             vs
                     1. M/s.Assured Capital Services,
                     Represented by its Managing Partner,
                     Balachandar

                     2. R. Balachandar

                     3. Shahul Hameed

                     4. Selvakumar                                     ...       Defendants
                     Prayer: Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil
                     Procedure and Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules, 1994 to pass a
                     judgment and decree for the following reliefs:-

                     1/13



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                C.S. No.155 of 2021

                                         a) Directing the defendants to jointly and severally
                              pay a sum of Rs.77,71,644.50 (Rupees seventy Seven lakh
                              seventy one thousand six hundred forty four and fifty one paise)
                              together with interest at 18% per annum from the date of plaint
                              till the date of realisation.
                                         b) Directing the defendants, jointly and severally, to
                              pay a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- (Twenty five lakhs only) as
                              damages to the plaintiffs for mental pain and suffering caused
                              on account of the misappropriation and fraud perpetrated by the
                              defendants :
                                         c) To pay the costs of this suit :
                                         d) To grant such other reliefs


                                     For Plaintiffs : Mr.Sharath Chandran

                                                         JUDGMENT

The suit has been filed for recovery of a sum of

Rs.77,71,644.51 against the defendants jointly and severally together

with interest and costs. The plaintiffs have also sought for a recovery of

a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- as damages for the mental pain and suffering

caused on account of the misappropriation and fraud perpetrated by the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

defendants.

2. The plaintiffs are members of one family. The second and

third plaintiff are the wife and daughter of the first plaintiff. The fifth

plaintiff is the sister of the first plaintiff. The fourth plaintiff is her

husband. The seventh plaintiff is the brother of the first plaintiff. The

eighth plaintiff is the wife of the seventh plaintiff. The sixth plaintiff is

the sister-in-law of the first plaintiff. The plaintiffs have collectively, as

one family, invested sums in the 1st defendant firm. The first defendant

firm is run by defendants 2-4. The defendants 2 to 4 used the first

defendant firm as a front to lure innocent citizens to invest their hard

earned savings with a promise to return double the value in a short span

of 134 days.

3. According to the plaintiffs lured by the representations of the

defendants, the first plaintiff invested a sum of Rs.14,00,000/- with the

first defendant which was transferred to the account of the first defendant

by the first plaintiff through RTGS transactions, i.e., on 13.12.2018

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

(Rs.2,00,000/-); on 07.01.2019 (Rs.6,00,000/-) and on 10.01.2019

(Rs.6,00,000/-). According to the first plaintiff, his bank statements

prove that the aforementioned transfers were made by the first plaintiff to

the account of the first defendant. According to the first plaintiff, the

first defendant issued a welcome letter dated Nil informing the first

plaintiff that his money has been invested in seven different package

plans with different daily pay outs. Under the seven payout plans, the

first plaintiff has to be paid daily pay outs of Rs.21,000/- for a period of

134 days. According to the first plaintiff, pay outs were made by the first

defendant only for the first few days and thereafter no pay outs were

made by the first defendant.

4. According to the first plaintiff, the second and third and

fourth defendants visited the first plaintiff from time and time and

requested him to invest more money through his family and well wishers.

According to the first plaintiff, he did not suspect the sinister motives of

the defendants and he did not suspect that the entire operation of the first

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

defendant was a scam luring innocent investors to part with their hard

earned money. It is the case of the first plaintiff that several investors

who have fallen prey to the fraud perpetrated by the defendants and they

have been cheated to the extent of crores of rupees on the promise that

their investment will be doubled in return.

5. According to the first plaintiff on the strength of the

fraudulent representations, he also invested another sum of

Rs.14,00,000/- in the name of his wife, the second plaintiff herein and the

said amount was also transferred through RTGS to the account of the first

defendant. As in the case of the investment made by the first plaintiff,

same assurances were given by the first defendant for the investment

made in the name of the second plaintiff also as the first defendant

promised the very same return as was promised to the first plaintiff for

his investment.

6. The third plaintiff is the daughter of the first plaintiff and the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

first plaintiff has similarly invested another sum of Rs.14,00,000/- in her

name with the first defendant and the same returns were promised.

7. As in the case of the plaintiffs Nos.1, 2 and 3, the other

family members of the first plaintiff viz., 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th 8th plaintiffs have

also invested a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- each, totally amounting to

Rs.30,00,000/- with the first defendant company and similar returns were

also promised to them as was promised to the plaintiffs 1 to 3 for their

investments. Even for them also excepting for making pay outs for few

days, the first defendant stopped making any pay outs thereafter. On

28.02.2019, a video is released by the second defendant tendering

unconditional apology for the delay and promising the repayments to the

investors from 12.03.2019. According to the plaintiffs the said promise

was also not kept. The first plaintiff has lodged a criminal complaint

against the defendants on 27.03.2019 with regard to the non return of the

investments and an FIR in Crime No.156 of 2019 came to be registered

against the defendants by the Crime Branch on 06.05.2019 for offences

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

under Sections 409, 420 and 34 of the IPC. It is the case of the

plaintiffs, that the 2nd defendant was arrested and later released on bail.

According to the plaintiffs, it was learnt that the defendants had colluded

with the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thanavel and had attempted

to escape the clutches of the law. According to the first plaintiff, he

filed Crl. O.P. No.7622 of 2020 before this Court and by order dated

15.05.2020, this Court was pleased to direct the investigation to be

monitored by the Deputy Commissioner of Police CCB, Vepery, Chennai.

8. Since the amounts have not been refunded till date with the

promised return, the plaintiffs have filed the suit and they have given the

particulars of the dues payable to them in paragraph No.12 of the plaint,

which is extracted hereunder :

                                  Name                         Balance outstanding as
                                                               on 28.10.2020 (Except
                                                               Mrs.Udayarekha)
                                  E. Kandhan                              13,50,624.66
                                  K.Santhanalakshmi                       14,37,091.18
                                  K. Yamini                               14,21,705.68





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   C.S. No.155 of 2021

                                  E. Ramadoss                                 6,76,567.5
                                  R. Vasantha                                 6,76,567.5
                                  Udayarekha             (from              7,88,493.49
                                  30.01.2019)
                                  E. Srinivasan                             7,10,297.25
                                  Jothilakshmi                              7,10,297.25
                                  Total                                    77,71,644.51


9. The plaintiffs have also sought damages for the mental

agony and pain caused to them for a sum of Rs.25,00,000/-. This Court

by its order dated 26.08.2021 passed in A. No.1658 of 2021 permitted the

plaintiffs to combine their cause of action against the respondents /

defendants since all the plaintiffs are family members and all of them

have been deceived by the defendants with regard to the investments

made by them with the first defendant Company.

10. Substituted Service was ordered by this Court for service of

suit summons on the defendants as the suit summons sent earlier by the

plaintiffs were evaded by the defendants. The defendants were set

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

exparte by this Court on 02.12.2021.

11. Mr.E. Kandan, the first plaintiff was examined as a witness

(PW1) before the learned Master and he has deposed on behalf of the

remaining plaintiffs also. In his deposition in the form of proof affidavit,

he has reiterated the contents of the plaint filed in support of C.S. No.155

of 2021. Through PW1, the following documents have been marked as

Exhibits :

                                  Exhibits                      Nature of the document

                             Ex.P1           Online copy of investment details along with certified copy of

bank statement of 1st plaintiff (65B certificate) Ex.P2 Online copy of investment details along with certified copy of bank statement and money transfers of K.Santhanalakshmi (65B certificate) Ex.P3 Online copy of investment details and along with certified copy of bank statement money transfers of Miss. Yamini(65B certificate) Ex.P4 Online copy of investment details along with certified copy of bank statement and money transfers of Ramadoss (65B certificate) Ex.P5 Online copy of investment details along with certified copy of bank statement and money transfers of E. Vasantha (65B certificate) Ex.P6 Online copy of investment details along with certified copy of bank statement and money transfers of S. Udayarekha (65B certificate) Ex.P7 Online copy of investment details along with certified copy of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

Exhibits Nature of the document

bank statement and money transfers of E. Srinivasan (65B certificate) Ex.P8 Online copy of investment details along with certified copy of bank statement and money transfers of S. Jothilakshmi (65B certificate) Ex.P9 (Series Email sent by the 1st defendant (65B certificate) No.6 documents) Ex.P10 Certified copy of the complaint given by the 1st plaintiff dated 27.03.2019 Ex.P11 Certified copy of FIR 156 of 2019 dated 08.05.2019 Ex.P12 Certified order passed in Cr. OP No.7622 of 2020

12. As seen from the pleadings and the evidence available on

record, it is clear that all the plaintiffs have invested a total sum of

Rs.72,00,000/- with the first defendant in which, the second, third and

fourth defendants are its Directors and who have deceived the plaintiffs

in investing huge sums of money on the promise of providing substantial

returns for their investments.

13. The first plaintiff has also lodged a criminal complaint

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

against the defendants and an FIR has been registered which is under

investigation by the police and the proof of the same has also been filed

which has been marked as Ex.P11 and Ex.P12. The details of the

investments made by the respective plaintiffs have also been marked as

Exhibits Viz., Ex.P1 to P8.

14. The details of the outstanding amount due and payable by

the defendants to the plaintiffs have also been disclosed in paragraph

No.12 of the plaint, which is in accordance with the agreement between

the plaintiffs and the defendants. However, apart from seeking for

recovery of the investments made by the respective plaintiffs together

with their returns and interest, the plaintiffs have also claimed

compensation towards mental agony on account of the fraud committed

by the defendants to the extent of Rs.25,00,000/-. No evidence has been

placed by the plaintiffs with regard to the said claim. The learned

counsel for the plaintiffs on instructions would also submit that he is not

pressing the claim for damages. The said statement is recorded by this

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

Court.

15. After perusing and examining the pleadings as well as

evidence available on record, this Court is inclined to decree the suit

insofar as the prayer No.(a) found in the paragraph No.17 of the plaint is

concerned and insofar as prayer No.(b) in paragraph No.17, it is

disallowed. The suit is therefore decreed for a sum of Rs.77,71,644.51,

together with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of plaint till the date of

realisation and the plaintiffs are also entitled for the costs of the suit.

15.12.2021

Index:Yes/No Internet : Yes / No Speaking Order: Yes/No

vsi2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. No.155 of 2021

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vsi2

C.S. No.155 of 2021

15.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter