Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24389 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2021
C.S.No.490 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
C.S.No.490 of 2006
C.Prakash ... Plaintiff
Vs.
1.K.Chandramathi
2.G.Sarala Ramachandran
3.G.Kannadasan
4.G.Vinod Kumar ... Defendants
Prayer: The Civil Suit has been filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original
Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. 1908, praying to pass the
judgment and decree by passing a preliminary decree for partition of the
plaint schedule properties by dividing 1/5th share in schedule – A, D and
properties, 1/3rd share in schedule – B property and 1/4 th share in the
schedule – C property.
(a) partition of the suit property mentioned in the schedule – A, D and E by
metes and bounds and deliver to the plaintiff his separate 1/5th share thereof;
(b) partition of the suit property mentioned in the schedule – B by metes and
bounds and deliver to the plaintiff his separate 1/3 share thereof;
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.490 of 2006
(c) partition of the suit property mentioned in the schedule – C by metes and
bounds and deliver to the plaintiff his separate 1/4th share thereof;
(d) to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to inspect all the schedule
mentioned properties and divide the schedule mentioned properties by
metes and bounds;
(e) to pass a final decree of partition by dividing 1/5th share in the schedule
– A, D and properties, 1/3rd share in schedule – B property and 1/4th share in
the schedule – C property and for costs.
For Plaintiff : M/s Ratnasabapathy
For D2 : S.S. Swaminathan
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the defendant has conceded to make a statement that
the suit is laid for partition and both sides have amicably settled the issue
between them outside the Court.
2.Learned counsel for the plaintiff made a statement that he had no
instructions in this regard and therefore on the earlier occasion this Court
permitted him to find out the position.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.490 of 2006
3.Today, the learned counsel has filed a memo dated 02.12.2021, in which,
he has stated that his efforts to serve communications on his client have
failed as his client is not claiming the mail sent by him.
4.If the plaintiff wants to compromise with the defendant without the aid of
the judicial process that is welcomed. However, his duty to the institution
and to the Courts will not be complete till he volunteers to make use of this
redressal facility. In this circumstance, this Court has expressed above as to
what exactly has transpired. Now, this Court is left with little option but to
dismiss the suit.
4.In the result, this suit is dismissed. No costs.
10.12.2021 kas
Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no Speaking / Non speaking order
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.490 of 2006
N.SESHASAYEE kas
C.No.490 of 2006
10.12.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!