Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23806 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 December, 2021
W.A.No.606 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 03.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.A.No.606 of 2016
All India Repatriates Welfare Association
[Burma, Srilanka & Vietnam],
Head Office : No.15, Madhavaram High Road,
Perambur, Chennai – 600 011.
Rep. By its President Shri Su.Jeevan
... Appellant
v.
1. The Secretary,
Ministry of Home Affairs,
Government of India, North Block,
New Delhi – 110 001.
2. The Chairman,
Public Enterprise Selection Board,
No.502, Block No.14, P.F. Bhawan,
CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003.
3. Repco Bank,
Rep. By its General Manager Mr.O.M. Gokul,
No.33,Norht Usman Road,
T. Nagar, Chennai – 600 017
[R-3 impleaded as party respondent vide order of this
court dated 21.06.2018 made in CMP No.6804/2017
in W.A.No.606/2016 by KKSJ & RSMJ] ... Respondents
Page 1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.606 of 2016
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order
made in W.P.No.4445 of 2016, dated 05.02.2016.
For Appellants : Mr. Stalin Abhimanyu
For Respondents : No Appearance – R1
Mr. S.Diwakar – R2
Mr. Om Prakash, Senior Counsel
for Mr. A.Ilangovan – R3
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.)
Challenging the order passed in W.P.No.4445 of 2016, dated
05.02.2016, the Writ Petitioner has filed the above Writ Appeal.
2. The appellant filed the Writ Petition to issue a Writ of
Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to initiate the recruitment process
for the post of Managing Director of Repco Bank (Repatriates Co-
operative Finance and Development Bank) through the 2nd respondent
and also to complete the selection.
Page 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.606 of 2016
3. The learned Single Judge taking into consideration the case of
both sides, dismissed the Writ Petition. Challenging the same, the Writ
Petitioner has filed the above Writ Appeal.
4. When the Writ Appeal is taken up for hearing, Mr. Stalin
Abhimanyu, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that
the 3rd respondent had already completed the selection process and
nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Appeal. Further, the
learned counsel submitted that liberty may be granted to the appellant to
challenge the order of appointment, in accordance with law.
5. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on
either side, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. It is open to
the appellant to challenge the order of appointment, in accordance with
law. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.]
03.12.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet: Yes
Rj
Page 3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.606 of 2016
To
1. The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.
2. The Chairman, Public Enterprise Selection Board, No.502, Block No.14, P.F. Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003.
3. Mr.O.M. Gokul, General Manager, Repco Bank, No.33,Norht Usman Road, T. Nagar, Chennai – 600 017
Page 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.606 of 2016
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD ,J
Rj
W.A.No.606 of 2016
03.12.2021
Page 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!