Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.S.Shanthi vs V.Ramakrishnan
2021 Latest Caselaw 23696 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23696 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021

Madras High Court
T.S.Shanthi vs V.Ramakrishnan on 2 December, 2021
                                                                                     Crl. O.P. No. 29081 of 2017


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    Dated 02.12.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

                                              Crl. O.P. No. 29081 of 2017
                                                          and
                                         Crl.M.P.Nos.16421 and 16422 of 2017


                     T.S.Shanthi                                                      . . . Petitioner

                                                           Versus

                     V.Ramakrishnan                                                 . . . Respondent



                     PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call

                     for the records in C.C.No.110 of 2016, pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate

                     Fast Track Court, Alandur and quash the same.



                                        For Petitioner              : Mr.S.P.Meenakshi Sundaram

                                        For Respondent              : Notice sent- Service awaited




                     Page No:1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                          Crl. O.P. No. 29081 of 2017


                                                              ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the criminal

proceedings in C.C.No.110 of 2016, on the file of Judicial Magistrate Fast

Track Court, Alandur.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the

entire materials available on record.

3.The petitioner is charged with an offence under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act. Having gone through the materials available on

record, this Court is of the considered view that, when a complaint is filed under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, this Court cannot go into the

question of fact as to the validity of the issuance of cheque and whether the

cheque has been issued towards a legally enforceable debt or not. Those issues

are factual and triable issues, which have to be decided only by way of a full

fledged trial and not otherwise under Section 482 of Code of Criminal

Procedure. The above view of this Court is fortified by the decision of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Vs.

BHAJANLAL AND OTHERS 1992 Supp (1) Supreme Court Cases 335,

Page No:2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No. 29081 of 2017

wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the power of quashing a

criminal proceeding should be exercised very sparingly and with

circumspection.

4.In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that, quashing of

the case cannot be considered at this point of time. Accordingly, this Criminal

Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Criminal

Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

5.It is for the petitioner to take all her defence before the trial Court. The

petitioner/accused is directed to appear before the trial Court within two weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file an application under

Section 436 of Code of Criminal Procedure. On such filing of the application,

the trial Court is directed to release the petitioner on bail on the same day on she

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each

with two sureties. If thereafter, she absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered

under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

Page No:3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No. 29081 of 2017

6.At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks

indulgence of this Court to grant an order dispensing with the personal

appearance of the petitioner. Accordingly, the personal appearance of the

petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies,

answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of

judgment, or on any other date as may be required by the trial Court.

02.12.2021 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order

psa/mkn

To

The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Alandur.

Page No:4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No. 29081 of 2017

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

psa/mkn

Crl. O.P. No. 29081 of 2017

02.12.2021

Page No:5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter