Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Rajarathinam vs R.Sargunam
2021 Latest Caselaw 23673 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23673 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Rajarathinam vs R.Sargunam on 2 December, 2021
                                                                               C.M.A.No.3672 of 2019

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 02.12.2021

                                                          CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
                                                 and
                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

                                  C.M.A. No.3672 of 2019 and C.M.P. No.20996 of 2019

                   R.Rajarathinam                                      ... Appellant

                                                           vs

                   R.Sargunam                                          ... Respondent


                   Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act against
                   the order passed by the V Additional Family Court, Chennai dated
                   19.08.2019 made in I.A. No.1 of 2019 in O.P. No.565 of 2019.


                                     For Appellant    :     Mr.M.Liyagatali

                                     For Respondent   :     No appearance

                                                      JUDGMENT

[Judgment of this Court was delivered by T.RAJA, J.]

This appeal has been brought up before us by R.Rajarathinam,

the appellant herein, challenging the correctness of the impugned

order dated 19.08.2019 made in I.A. No.1 of 2019 in O.P. No.565 of

2019 passed by the V Additional Family Court, Chennai, directing him

to pay a sum of Rs.8,000/- per month towards interim maintenance

apart from the maintenance amount ordered in Crl.M.P. No.156 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.3672 of 2019

2018 in D.V.C. No.53 of 2017 by the XVI Metropolitan Magistrate,

George Town, Chennai on 12.01.2018.

2.Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that

when the appellant has been eking out his livelihood from his pension

of Rs.18,251/-, both the petitions in Crl.M.P. No.156 of 2018 in

D.V.C. No.53 of 2017 and M.P. No.1 of 2019 in H.M.O.P. No.565 of

2019, filed by the respondent, were ordered by the XVI Metropolitan

Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and the V Additional Family Court,

Chennai respectively granting monthly maintenance of Rs.7,000/-

and Rs.8,000/-, which is untenable. Learned counsel appearing for

the appellant further submitted that the respondent wife is living

separately in the first floor and their married daughter is residing in

the ground floor with her husband and sadly, the appellant, who is

the owner of the house, has been residing in the terrace portion of

the house and paying Rs.10,000/- towards monthly maintenance to

his wife, obeying the orders passed by the XVI Metropolitan

Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and the V Additional Family Court,

Chennai. As the monthly pension of the appellant has been enhanced

to Rs.27,000/-, the appellant has been obediently paying the above

amount of Rs.10,000/- to his wife. Therefore, learned counsel

appearing for the appellant prays for passing an order continuing to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.3672 of 2019

pay the same amount towards monthly maintenance, otherwise, the

appellant will be left with no other source of income.

3.Although notice has been issued and served on the

respondent, she has not entered appearance either through counsel

or by herself that shows she is not inclined to answer the averments

made by the appellant. Secondly, in the case of Rajnesh vs. Neha

reported in 2021 (2) SCC 324, the Apex Court, while dealing with the

payment of maintenance by one spouse to another, has vividly and

categorically ruled that the parties approaching the Court seeking

maintenance, shall file their affidavit of assets and liabilities and also

the present status as on the date of filing their application so as to

ensure the payment of fair maintenance by one party to other. It is

necessary to extract the relevant portion as under:

'(xi) Keeping in mind the need for a uniform format of Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities to be filed in maintenance proceedings, this Court considers it necessary to frame guidelines in exercise of our powers under Article 136 read with Article 142 of the Constitution of India:

(a)The Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities annexed at Enclosures I, II and III of this judgment, as may be applicable, shall be filed by the parties in all maintenance proceedings, including pending proceedings before the concerned Family Court/District Court/

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.3672 of 2019

Magistrates Courts, as the case may be, throughout the country;

....'

4.Although the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that the Affidavit of

Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities annexed therein at Enclosures I,

II and III of the judgment, as may be applicable, shall be filed by the

parties in all maintenance proceedings, including pending

proceedings before the concerned Family Court/District Court/

Magistrates Courts, as the case may be, throughout the country, in

the present case, both the parties have not filed their Affidavit of

Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities, since the aforementioned

judgment has been passed after filing of the petitions in Crl.M.P.

No.156 of 2018 in D.V.C. No.53 of 2017 and M.P. No.1 of 2019 in

H.M.O.P. No.565 of 2019. Therefore, we are unable to find out the

assets and liabilities of the respondent.

5.A perusal of the Pension Payment Order No.16785 and

Payment of Commutation of the appellant clearly shows that after

serving as a Syrang – Marine in the Chennai Port Trust, he has been

retired from service and getting pension at Rs.18,251/- as on

12.06.2017. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant fairly

submitted that the monthly pension of the appellant has been

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.3672 of 2019

enhanced to Rs.27,000/- and he has been punctually paying

Rs.10,000/- to his wife towards monthly maintenance. Therefore,

finding that the appellant has been paying a sum of Rs.10,000/- to

his wife towards monthly maintenance, we are inclined to dispose of

this appeal by giving a direction to the appellant to continue to pay

the above amount. Accordingly, this appeal stands disposed of and

the appellant is directed to continue to pay the above amount of

Rs.10,000/- towards monthly maintenance to his wife. Consequently,

C.M.P. No.20996 of 2019 stands closed. No costs.

                                                            [T.R.,J.]            [D.B.C.,J.]
                                                                        02.12.2021
                   vga


                   To

1.The V Additional Family Court, Chennai.

2.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.3672 of 2019

T.RAJA,J.

and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J.

vga

C.M.A. No.3672 of 2019 and C.M.P. No.20996 of 2019

02.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter