Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs U. Saravanan
2021 Latest Caselaw 17615 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17615 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs U. Saravanan on 27 August, 2021
                                                                              C.M.A.No.2510 of 2021

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 27.08.2021

                                                      CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

                                             C.M.A.No. 2510 of 2021 and
                                               C.M.P.No.14421 of 2021

                      The Managing Director,
                      Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
                      Villupuram Ltd.,
                      Vazhuga Reddy,
                      Villupuram - II                                         ...Appellant

                                                       ..Vs..

                      U. Saravanan                                            ...Respondent



                      Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor

                      Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.04.2019

                      made in M.C.O.P.No. 965 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims

                      Tribunal, Special Sub Judge I, Small Causes Court, Chennai.


                                   For Appellant:         Mr.K.J. Sivakumar




                      Page No.1 of 8
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                               C.M.A.No.2510 of 2021

                                                   JUDGMENT

This Appeal has been filed by the Transport Corporation challenging

the Award dated 22.04.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Special Sub Judge I, Small Causes Court, Chennai in

M.C.O.P.No. 965 of 2011, directing the Appellant/Transport Corporation to

pay the Claimant a sum of Rs.7,58,900/- as compensation for the injuries

sustained in an accident which occurred on 20.12.2010 involving the bus

owned by the appellant/Transport Corporation.

2. Before the Tribunal, the Respondent/Claimant claimed a sum of

Rs.20,00,000/- as compensation for the injuries sustained by him. On the

side of the Respondent/claimant, P.W.1 & P.W.2 were examined as

witnesses and Exs.P1 to P13 were marked before the Claims Tribunal. On

the side of the Appellant/Transport Corporation, R.W.1 was examined as

witness and no exhibit was marked.

3.On consideration of the oral and documentary evidence available on

record, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.7,58,900/- as compensation to

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2510 of 2021

the Respondent/Claimant. Details of the compensation awarded by the

Tribunal under the impugned Award, are as follows :

Amount awarded by Heads the Tribunal (Rs.) Disability (20%) 60,000.0 Pain and sufferings 30,000.0 Extra Nourishment 20,000.0 Transport charges 5,000.00 Hospital & Medical expenses 5,80,661 Attender charges 15,250.0 Loss of Earning 28,000.0 Loss of future prospects 20,000.0 Total Rs.7,58,911/-

Rounded off Rs.7,58,900/-

4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material

documents available on record.

5. The Appellant has challenged the impugned award on the ground

that mere registration of an FIR is not enough for holding negligence on

their part. The Claims Tribunal ought not to have awarded a sum of

Rs.60,000/- on the head of disability which is on the higher side. Further,

the compensation awarded towards other heads are also huge and same

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2510 of 2021

needs to be reduced.

6. Insofar as the first contention raised by the Appellant is concerned,

the Respondent/Claimant has proved his case by filing an FIR, which has

been marked as Ex.P1 and though the Appellant denied about the accident

and stated that the accident occurred only on the negligent act of the

Claimant, no contra evidence has been produced by the Appellant before

the Tribunal to disprove the contention of the Respondent/Claimant that only

due to the rash and negligent driving by the driver of the bus owned by the

appellant/Transport Corporation, the accident had happened which resulted

in injuries sustained by him. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view

that there is no basis for the Appellant to contend that mere registration of

an FIR against the Driver of the bus without corroboration by any other

independent witness.

7. Insofar as the compensation awarded towards disability is

concerned, Respondent/Claimant has sustained following injuries;

i) Fracture both bone left leg

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2510 of 2021

ii) degloving injury both legs

iii) dislocation of left shoulder

iv) haemorrhagic contusion left parietal region

8. The aforesaid injuries appears to be grievous in nature. Further, the

claimant has filed the Wound Certificate, discharge summary, Medical Bills,

Prescriptions which was marked as Exs.P3 to P9. In Ex.P13-Disability

certificate, though the P.W.2-Doctor assessed the disability @ 40% , the

Claims Tribunal has fixed only 20% and by taking Rs.3,000/- per

percentage, awarded a sum of Rs.60,000/- (3000x20) towards permanent

disability, which this Court feels is a just one and does not warrant

interference.

9. Considering the nature of injuries sustained by the

Respondent/Claimant, period of treatment undergone, the quantum of

compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the Respondent/Claimant under

various heads, totalling a sum of Rs.7,58,900/-, cannot be considered to be

excessive, as alleged by the Appellant/ Transport Corporation. For the

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2510 of 2021

foregoing reasons, this Court does not find any merit in this Appeal and

accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

10. The Appellant/Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the

entire amount awarded by the Tribunal together with interest at 7.5% per

annum from the date of the Claim Petition till the date of realization, less the

amount, if any, already deposited to the credit of M.C.O.P.No. 965 of 2011

on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge I,

Small Causes Court, Chennai, within a period of eight weeks from the date

of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made, the

Tribunal is directed to transfer the Award amount directly to the Bank

account of the Respondent/Claimant through RTGS, within a period of two

weeks.


                                                                                          27.08.2021

                      Index               :     Yes / No
                      Speaking Order      :     Yes / No

                      (arr)/(shk)





http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                            C.M.A.No.2510 of 2021

                      To:

1. The Motor accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge I, Small Causes Court, Chennai

2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2510 of 2021

(arr)/(shk)

C.M.A. No.2510 of 2021

27.08.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter