Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17115 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2021
1 S.A.(MD)Nos.366 & 367 OF 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
S.A.(MD)Nos.366 & 367 of 2011 and
C.M.P.(MD)Nos.10805 to 10808 of 2011 &
M.P.(MD)Nos.1,1,2 to 4 of 2011
S.A.(MD)No.366 of 2011
S.Gopalsamy Naicker ... Appellant / 1st Respondent /
Plaintiff
Vs.
Subbaiah Naicker(Died)
1. Senniammal
2. Pankarusamy
3. Saraswathi
4. Gurusamy
5. Thamarai Kannan
6. Srinivasagan
7. Kamalakannan
8. Ranukadevi ... Respondents 1 to 8 /
Appellants 2 to 9 /
Defendants
9. Seethammal ... 9th Respondent /
2nd Respondent /
2nd Defendant
Prayer: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of
C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree made in A.S.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/5
2 S.A.(MD)Nos.366 & 367 OF 2011
No.15 of 2007, dated 30.07.2010 on the file of the Sub Court,
Srivilliputhur, reversing the judgment and decree made in
O.S.No.633 of 2004, dated 08.12.2006 on the file of the
Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur.
S.A.(MD)No.367 of 2011
1. Gopalsamy @ Sukra Naicker
2. Athilakshmi
3. Seenivasan
4. Dhavamani
5. Sethuraj
6. Sathya ... Appellants / Respondents 1 to 3,5 to 7 /
Defendants 1 to 3, 5 to 7
Vs.
Subbaiah Naicker(Died)
1. Senniammal
2. Pankarusamy
3. Saraswathi
4. Gurusamy
5. Thamarai Kannan
6. Srinivasan
7. Kamalakannan
8. Renukadevi ... Respondents 1 to 8 /
Appellants 2 to 9 /
Plaintiffs
9. Narayanasamy ... 9th Respondent /
4th Respondent /
4th Defendant
Prayer: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of
C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree made in A.S.
No.16 of 2007, dated 30.07.2010 on the file of the Sub Court,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
2/5
3 S.A.(MD)Nos.366 & 367 OF 2011
Srivilliputhur, reversing the judgment and decree made in
O.S.No.704 of 2004, dated 08.12.2006 on the file of the
Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur.
(in both S.As.)
For Appellants : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu
For R-1 to R-8 : Mr.A.Sivaji
R-9 in S.A.(MD)
No.366 of 2011 : Died.
R-9 in S.A.(MD)
No.367 of 2011 : Left India.
***
COMMON JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants
informs this Court that the matter has been amicably settled
out of Court. He seeks leave to withdraw both the appeals.
2. In view of the same, these second appeals are
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petitions are closed.
19.08.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
PMU
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
3/5
4 S.A.(MD)Nos.366 & 367 OF 2011
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to
COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be
utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the
copy of the order that is presented is the correct
copy, shall be the responsibility of the
advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
1. The Sub Judge,
Srivilliputhur.
2. The Principal District Munsif,
Srivilliputhur.
3. The Record Keeper, V.R.Section,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
4/5
5 S.A.(MD)Nos.366 & 367 OF 2011
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
PMU
S.A.(MD)Nos.366 & 367 of 2011
19.08.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!