Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R. Jayakumar vs R. Amruthakumari
2021 Latest Caselaw 16124 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16124 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2021

Madras High Court
R. Jayakumar vs R. Amruthakumari on 9 August, 2021
                                                                                  SA No.1217 of 2006

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 09.08.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                                 SA No.1217 of 2006
                                                        and
                                                  MP No.2 of 2006

                     R. Jayakumar                                ...   Appellant

                                                     versus
                     M/s.Chithirala Finance Corporation
                     a Firm represented by its partners
                     1. R. Amruthakumari
                     2. Dr.Snehalatha Sudarshan
                     3. C. Ramesh                                ...   Respondents



                               Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code
                     against the judgment and decree made in A.S. No.108 of 2004 by the I
                     Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai dated 16.11.2004 confirming the
                     judgment and decree made in O.S. No.610 of 1998, dated 23.06.2003 by
                     the learned XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.



                               For Appellant         : Mr.K.Chandrasekaran
                               For Respondents       : Mr.M.Devendran
                                                           for R1 & R2
                                                       Not ready in notice reg. R3


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/6
                                                                                         SA No.1217 of 2006



                                                       JUDGMENT

(Heard Video Conference)

Parties to the Second Appeal have filed a Joint Memorandum of

Compromise, dated 27.07.2021. All the parties have signed this Joint

Memorandum of Compromise and the respective counsels have also

signed the same. The same is recorded by this Court.

2. The said Joint Compromise Memo reads as follows:

1. The following terms of compromise is entered into

between the parties

a. The Appellant /Plaintiff is deemed to have retired as on

9.12.1997.

b. The Appellant / Plaintiff shall not be fastened with any

liability in whatsoever manner with any loss which the firm may

sustain in or has sustained since inception or with any claim by

any third party and /or depositor or by any other Respondents /

Defendants of the firm. In the event of the retiring partner viz.,

the Plaintiff is fastened with any kind of liability and put to loss

or damage by any claim made by any third party whether arising

out of any deposit (both Principal and interest) with the firm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

SA No.1217 of 2006

made by such third party or claim arising out of whatsoever

nature the Respondents / Defendants shall indemnify the

Plaintiff against any such loss or damage.

c. It is agreed between the parties that the Appellant /

Plaintiff shall not be liable for any loss if any sustained by the

firm so far or which may come to light or surface in future and

the Defendants alone shall be responsible. The Defendants will

also be responsible for return of the deposits (both Principal and

interest).

d. The Appellant /Plaintiff shall not be fastened with any

statutory liability due by the Firm either in the past or in the

present or in the future either by Income Tax Department or any

other Department whatsoever.

e. There are deposits in the firm made by the wife and son

of the Appellant / Plaintiff. Appellant /Plaintiff assures that they

will not make any claim for refund of the same nor initiate any

kind of proceedings. In case they claim refund of the same or

initiate any kind of proceedings the Appellant / Plaintiff alone

shall be liable and other Respondents / Defendants shall not be

liable for any such action if taken by them.

f. It is hereby agreed that there will be no claims / cross

claims against the partners of the firm that is the Appellant and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

SA No.1217 of 2006

the Respondents. Once this Memorandum of Compromise is

signed and Decree obtained, all claims against one another will

be extinguished forever so far as the firm Chithirala Finance

Corporation is concerned.

g. It is mutually agreed between the Plaintiff and

Defendants that they will request the Honourable Court through

their respective counsel to grant permission to dispense with the

physical presence of the parties in person before the Honourable

High Court due to Covid 19 pandemic.

h. The Appellant / Plaintiff shall issue a paper publication

about his retirement from the firm.

i. It is mutually agreed between the Plaintiff and

Defendants that once this Memorandum of Compromise is duly

signed by all the parties and a decree obtained all the financial

records, account books etc. pertaining to the business of the firm

shall continue to remain with the Defendants as before.

j. Parties to bear their own cost through out.

k. This Memorandum of compromise is prepared in

triplicate and after it is duly signed by all the parties, one copy

will be kept by the Appellant and the second copy will be kept by

the Respondents. The third copy shall be filed into court after

having been signed by the parties, their witnesses and their https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

SA No.1217 of 2006

respective advocates for the purpose of obtaining a decree in S.A.

1217 of 2006 on the file of Hon'ble High Court of Madras.

3. In terms of the Memorandum of Compromise, dated 27.07.2021,

which shall form part of the order, this Second Appeal is disposed of.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

09.08.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2

To

1. The I Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.

2. The XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

SA No.1217 of 2006

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vsi2

SA No.1217 of 2006

09.08.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter