Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Rajendran vs The District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 15661 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15661 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021

Madras High Court
K.Rajendran vs The District Collector on 4 August, 2021
                                                                1

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       DATE: 4.8.2021.

                                                            CORAM

                                      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

                                                    W.P.No.12633 of 2021

                     K.Rajendran                                                     Petitioner

                                     vs.

                     1. The District Collector,
                        Salem, Salem District.

                     2. The Sub Registrar,
                        Aiyothiyapattinam Sub Registrar Office,
                        Salem 636 114.
                        Salem District.                                              Respondents

                           Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     seeking to issue a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent
                     to remove the encumbrance in pursuant to sale agreement dated
                     18.9.2007 in document No.2749/2007 in respect of S.No.149/1B3,
                     51/1B5 and 151/1B7 at Pallipatti Village, Salem Taluk and District.

                               For Petitioner       : Mr.M.Elango

                               For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Government Advocate


                                                            ORDER

The writ petitioner had purchased the land to an extent of 87.5

on 23.2.2021 from one Krishnan. The sale deed had been registered

as document No.916 in the office of the Sub Registrar of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Ayothiyapatnam, Salem. The petitioner has, then, found that there was

an agreement of sale which had also been registered in the office of

the said Sub Registrar as document No.2749/2007. Claiming that the

said entry should be deleted, the present writ petition has been filed in

the nature of a writ of mandamus.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on a judgment of

a learned Single Judge dated 9.12.2020 in W.P.No.17773 of 2020

wherein, in the very same circumstances, the learned Single Judge

had observed and held as under:-

"10. The above discussion by this Court makes it

therefore very clear that the entry made in the

Encumbrance Certificate with regard to the

agreement of sale dated 23.5.2008, has become

non-est in the eye of law. Such entry that remains in

the encumbrance certificate cannot be put against

the petitioner who has purchased the property in an

auction sale conducted by the Asset Re-construction

Company under the SARFAESI Act. This is the legal

position insofar as the right of the petitioner over the

subject property is concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

11. Apart from the above clarification given by

this Court, it is left open to the petitioner to present

this order for registration before the respondent and

the respondent can also register this order by virtue

of which the earlier entry made at the time of

registration of the agreement of sale automatically

gets reversed. The petitioner is directed to submit a

representation alongwith a certified copy of this order

before the respondent. The respondent, on receipt

of the same, shall register this order subject to the

payment of the necessary stamp duty and

registration fees."

3. In the instant case also, the petitioner herein gave a

representation to the second respondent, but, no action has been

taken on such representation.

4. It is to be noted that the learned Single Judge, in the case

cited supra had relied on the decision of a Division Bench in

.Ramayee v. The Sub Registrar, Registration Department and

others (2020-5-LW 385), wherein it had been held that registration

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

of an agreement of sale will not be a bar to further registration of sale

of the very same property.

5. In the light of the above ratio, it is left open to the petitioner

to present this order for registration before the respondent and the

respondent can also register this order by virtue of which the earlier

entry made at the time of registration of the agreement of sale

automatically gets reversed. The petitioner is directed to submit a

fresh representation alongwith a certified copy of this order before the

respondent. The respondent, on receipt of the same, shall register this

order subject to the payment of the necessary stamp duty and

registration fees.

                               6. The writ petition is disposed of.     No further orders will be

                     required.      No costs.


                                                                                       4.8.2021.
                     Index: Yes/No.
                     Internet: Yes/No.
                     ssk.

                     To
                     1. The District Collector,
                        Salem, Salem District.

                     2. The Sub Registrar,

Aiyothiyapattinam Sub Registrar Office, Salem 636 114, Salem District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

Ssk.

W.P.No.12633 of 2021

4.8.2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter