Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15586 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2021
TCA.No.37 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.08.2021
CORAM :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Ms.Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Tax Case Appeal No.37 of 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax-I,
Chennai. ...Appellant
Vs
M/s.Arihant Foundations & Housing Ltd.,
271, Poonamallee High Road,
Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. ...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the
order dated 20.07.2011 made in ITA.No.656/Mds/2011 on the file of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai for the assessment year
2004-05.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : M/s.Sriniranjani
for Mr.N.Muthukumar
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
TCA.No.37 of 2012
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam,J)
This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for brevity), is directed against the order dated
20.07.2011 in ITA No.656/Mds/2011 on the file of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'C' Bench for the assessment year 2004-05.
2.The appeal was admitted on 27.03.2012 to decide the following
substantial questions of law:
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in dismissing the Revenue's appeals as infructuous without going into the reasons discussed in the assessment orders wherein it has been made clear that the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, which issued the Plan Permit had not issued any completion certificate to the effect hat the project was completed before 31.03.2008 which was a condition to be satisfied for being eligible for the deduction u/s. 80-1B(10)?”
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.37 of 2012
3.We have heard Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned senior standing counsel
appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr.Sriranjani, learned counsel
appearing for the respondent/assessee.
4.The legal issue involved in the assessee's case was considered in the
assessee's own case in T.C.A.Nos.304 and 305 of 2011 and the appeals filed
by the revenue was dismissed by judgment dated 02.01.2019 on the ground
that there is no substantial question of law arisen for consideration. Further,
no distinguishing feature has been able to point out by the revenue to state
that the decision is not applicable. Hence, following the said decision, this
tax case appeal is dismissed as no substantial question of law arisen for
consideration. No costs.
(T.S.S.,J.) (S.S.K,J.) 03.08.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Judgment/Non speaking Judgment cse
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.37 of 2012
T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.
AND SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP,J.
cse
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai.
TCA.No.37 of 2012
03.08.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!