Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Paramasivam vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 9506 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9506 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Paramasivam vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 15 April, 2021
                                                              W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 15.04.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                                    THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

                                         W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021
                                                       and
                                   W.M.P(MD)Nos.5894, 5897, 5899 & 5900 of 2021

                 W.P(MD)No.7745 of 2021:-

                 R.Paramasivam                                         ... Petitioner


                                                       vs.


                 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                   Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
                   Adi Diravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,
                   Secretariat, Chennai.

                 2.The Commissioner of Adi Diravidar,
                   O/o.Adi Diravidar Welfare Department,
                   Chepauk, Chennai.

                 3.The District Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Officer,
                   O/o.Adi Diravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,
                   Trichy, Trichy District.

                 4.R.Mugesh Raj                                        ... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to impugned order passed by the third respondent in his

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

proceedings in Na.Ka.No.Ma4/19616.2020 dated 22.01.2021 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to proceed with the recruitment process of cook in conformity with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and the petitioner's candidature in accordance with law within the period stipulated by this Court.

W.P(MD)No.7748 of 2021:-

Y.Parameswari ... Petitioner

vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Adi Diravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner of Adi Diravidar, O/o.Adi Diravidar Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai.

3.The District Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Officer, O/o.Adi Diravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Trichy, Trichy District.

4.A.Adhistakumar ... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to impugned order passed by the third respondent in his proceedings dated 22.01.2021 and quash the same as illegal and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

consequently to direct the respondents to proceed with the recruitment process of cook in conformity with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and the petitioner's candidature in accordance with law within the period stipulated by this Court.

                                   For Petitioner       : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar
                                    (in both W.Ps')       for M/s.Ajmal Associates

                                   For RR 1 to 3        : Mr.C.Ramesh
                                     (in both W.Ps')      Special Government Pleader

                                                   COMMON ORDER


These Writ Petitions are filed seeking for Writs of Certiorarified

Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed

by the third respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.Ma4/19616.2020,

dated 22.01.2021 and quash the same and consequently, to direct the

respondents to proceed with the recruitment process of Cook in

conformity with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and the

petitioners candidature in accordance with law within the period

stipulated by this Court.

2.Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice

on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

3.According to the petitioners, they belong to Scheduled Caste

Community and have studied upto 8th Standard and 12th Standard

respectively. While so, the third respondent invited applications from the

eligible candidates for appointment to the post of Cook through

Employment Exchange as well as by way of paper advertisement. The

first respondent, by proceedings, dated 26.05.2020, prescribed the

following qualifications and other eligibility criteria, which reads as

follows:-

“i) The applicant should know to read and write in Tamil language and should not have passed in 10th standard (Highest Educational Qualification is S.S.L.C fail).

ii) Age limit is 35 years as on 01.07.2020.

iii) The applicant should be a resident of Trichy District.

iv) The preference should be given to the candidates with previous experience in cooking both Vegetarian and Non- Vegetarian food.

v) The applicant should be SC/ST/SCA.

vi) No civil/criminal case is pending against applicant.”

4.The petitioners being fully qualified for the appointment to the

post of Cook, had submitted applications along with necessary

documents. Thereafter, the third respondent, by proceedings, dated

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

14.12.2020, issued the interview call letter calling upon them to appear

before him on 28.12.2020. Pursuant to which, the petitioners have

participated in the interview held on 28.12.2020. While the petitioners

were awaiting for the appointment order, to their shock and surprise,

they came to know that the fourth respondent in both the Writ Petitions

were appointed.

5.According to the petitioners, the fourth respondent in both the

Writ Petitions belonged to other District and they got appointment by

producing bogus address. Further, according to the petitioners, some

overqualified persons were also appointed as Cook. As per the Judgment

of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.3602 of 2020 (Chief

Manager, Punjab National Bank and another Vs. Anit Kumar Das), if a

person is over qualified, he/she is disqualified for being appointed. In the

above circumstances, the petitioners have come out with the present

Writ Petitions, challenging the impugned orders, dated 22.01.2021

passed by the third respondent appointing the fourth respondent in both

the Writ Petitions.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

6.Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for

the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the fourth respondent in both the

Writ Petitions belonged to Trichy District and he has also produced the

copies of the Aadhar Card showing the address of the fourth respondent

within Trichy District. The learned Special Government Pleader further

submitted that earlier one M.Chandrasekar, with regard to the same

issue, had filed a Writ Petition in W.P(MD)No.4617 of 2021 and this Court

by order dated 05.03.2021, dismissed the said Writ Petition and prayed

for dismissal of the present Writ Petitions.

7.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the

learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents

1 to 3.

8.The grievance of the petitioners in both the Writ Petitions is that

the fourth respondent in both the Writ Petitions belonged to other District

and some overqualified persons were also appointed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

9.From the perusal of the impugned order and the copies of the

Aadhar Card produced by the learned Special Government Pleader, it is

seen that the addresses of the fourth respondent in both the Writ

Petitions are in Trichirappalli District. Further, it is seen that the

petitioners have not specifically stated that the fourth respondent in both

the Writ Petitions are overqualified and not entitled for appointment and

they have only stated that some of the persons appointed were

overqualified.

10.In view of the failure on the part of the petitioners to specifically

state in the affidavit that the fourth respondent in both the Writ Petitions

are over qualified and the fourth respondent in both the Writ Petitions

belonged to Trichirappalli District, the Writ Petitions are devoid of merits

and the same are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, both the Writ

Petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous

Petitions are dismissed.

15.04.2021 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ps

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

ps Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To

1.The Secretary to Government, Adi Diravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner of Adi Diravidar, O/o.Adi Diravidar Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai.

3.The District Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Officer, O/o.Adi Diravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Trichy, Trichy District.

W.P(MD)Nos.7745 & 7748 of 2021

15.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter