Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9050 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2021
T.C.A.No.542 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.04.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
T.C.A.No.542 of 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Tiruppur. ... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Arun Textiles P Ltd.,
80 Perumal Koil Street,
Tirupur. ... Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras,
“B” Bench, dated 11.08.2011 in I.TA.No.569/Mds/2011, Assessment
Year 2007-08.
For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar
Senior Standing Counsel
and Mrs.K.G.Usha Rani
Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman
Page 1/5
T.C.A.No.542 of 2013
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.) We have heard Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing
Counsel and Mrs.K.G.Usha Rani, learned Standing Counsel for the
appellant/Revenue and Mr.R.Sivaraman, learned counsel for the
respondent/assessee.
2.The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order
dated 11.08.2011 made in I.TA.No.569/Mds/2011 on the file of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “B” Bench (for brevity, the
Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 2007-08.
3.The appeal was admitted on 28.10.2013 on the following
substantial questions of law:
“1.Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that profits of the windmill for the purpose of computing deduction under Section 80 IA is to be determined on
Page 2/5 T.C.A.No.542 of 2013
the basis of price of Rs.3.50 per unit which the assessee otherwise would have paid, if it had bought from open market particularly when the assessee could realize only Rs.2.70 per unit for the supply made to the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board?
2.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the applicability of market rate as contemplated under Section 80 IA (8) is not to be adopted when the rates are regulated by the authorities like Electricity Board?”
4.The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant submits
that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on account of the
Low Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued
by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary
limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been
increased to Rs.1 crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in this
case is less than the threshold limit.
Page 3/5 T.C.A.No.542 of 2013
5.In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal
is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The
substantial questions of law framed are left open. In the event the tax
effect in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said
Circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this
Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.]
Index : Yes/No 01.04.2021
Internet : Yes
mkn
To
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “B” Bench
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Tiruppur.
Page 4/5 T.C.A.No.542 of 2013
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
and T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
mkn
T.C.A.No.542 of 2013
01.04.2021
Page 5/5
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!