Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11239 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.04.2021
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.R.P. (PD) Nos.1040 & 1041 of 2021
and
C.M.P.No.8308 of 2021
K.P.Jagannathan ..Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff
(in both the CRPs.)
Vs
1.V.C.K.Panchatcharam
2V.C.K.P.Mohankumar
3.V.C.K.P.Gopi
4.V.C.K.P.Iyappan
..Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
(in both the CRPs.)
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 24.02.2021 passed
in I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2020 in O.S.No.59 of 2014 on the file of the District
Munsif Court, Tirutani, Tiruvallur District.
For Petitioner .. Mr.V.Regunathan
For Respondents .. No appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
2
ORDER
The revision petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.59 of 2014
which is now pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tirutani.
2.These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed by the petitioner
herein questioning the order in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2020 dated
24.02.2021. The said applications have been filed seeking to reopen the
evidence and to recall DW-1 for cross-examination.
3.The learned District Munsif had taken into consideration all the
averments made in the applications and observed that, after the filing of
the written statement, the suit was listed in the year 2016 and the
petitioner herein had examined as witnesses PW-1 to PW-4 and the
evidence was closed in the year 2016. Thereafter, the defendants had
examined DW-1 and when the suit was posted for arguments, the present
revision petitioner had filed an application to amend the plaint. That
application was dismissed and again the suit was posted for arguments.
Thereafter, again, application had been filed to examine as witnesses the
mediators.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
4.The learned District Munsif had observed that there was no
allegation that mediation ever took place. That application was
dismissed.
5.Thereafter, the petitioner wanted to examine one Desigan who
had been allotted B schedule property, and who had died on 01.05.2012.
That fact of death was also suppressed before the Court. That petition
was also dismissed.
6.I am informed that the suit in O.S.No.59 of 2014 is posted for
judgment today. Let the learned District Munsif, Tirutani, deliver
judgment in accordance with the schedule maintained by the said Court.
7.These Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No order as to
costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is
closed.
30.04.2021 Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No smv
To The District Munsif Court, Tirutani.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
smv
C.R.P. (PD) Nos.1040 & 1041 of 2021
30.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!