Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10797 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2021
W.A.No.2369 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.04.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
and
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
W.A.No.2369 of 2018
and C.M.P.No.18772 of 2018
R.Sekar .. Appellant
Vs
1.The Special Commissioner,
Land Reforms,
Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tambaram,
Kancheepuram District. .. Respondents
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
the order dated 04.07.2018 made in W.P.No.16321 of 2018.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Muthappan
For Respondents : Mr.V.Kadhirvelu
Special Government Pleader
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.2369 of 2018
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 04.07.2018
made in W.P.No.16321 of 2018, whereby the learned single Judge
dismissed the writ petition.
2.We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant
and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the
respondents.
3.Though the appellant has approached this Court on the earlier
occasion, pursuant to the order passed in W.P.No.6295 of 2017, the
District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram, in and by the proceedings in
Na.Ka.No.3393/2017/Ni.Seer dated 09.06.2017, has asked the
Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram to look into the request of the
petitioner dated 16.05.2017 and do the needful.
4.Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the
learned single Judge wrongly dismissed the writ petition without taking
note of the non-conclusion of the aforesaid action initiated.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.2369 of 2018
5.Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the
respondents submitted that if no final decision is arrived, appropriate
order will have to be passed on the communication dated 09.06.2017.
6.Considering the submissions made, in the event of no final
decision having been taken already, appropriate final orders will have
to be passed by the respondent concerned pursuant to the proceedings
of the District Revenue Officer dated 09.06.2017, within a period of
twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
7.With the above observation, the writ appeal stands disposed
of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(M.M.S., J.) (R.N.M., J.)
27.04.2021
Index:Yes/No
mmi
To
1.The Special Commissioner,
Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram, Kancheepuram District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.2369 of 2018
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
and R.N.MANJULA,J.
mmi
W.A.No.2369 of 2018
27.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!