Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10679 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2021
W.A.No.909 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.04.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
and
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
W.A.No.909 of 2021
Sugirda Dinakar .. Appellant
Vs
1.Union of India
Rep. by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs,
Shastri Bhawan,
Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road,
New Delhi - 110 001.
2.Registrar of Companies,
Tamil Nadu, Chennai,
Block No.6,
B Wing, 2nd Floor, Shasthri Bhavan,
26, Haddows Road, Chennai - 6. .. Respondents
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
the order dated 27.01.2020 passed in W.P.No.3978 of 2019.
For Appellant : Mr.P.Ambili Menon
For Respondents : Mr.C.Kulanthaivel for R1
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.909 of 2021
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
This writ appeal is directed against the order dated
27.01.2020 passed in W.P.No.3978 of 2019, whereby the learned
single Judge dismissed the writ petition.
2.The issue involved is no longer res interga. Learned counsel
appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the
first respondent submitted that the question of invoking disqualification
has already been considered by a Division Bench of this Court, holding
in favour of the similarly placed person like the appellant. Reliance has
been made on the recent judgment of the Division Bench dated
26.03.2021 in W.A.No.908 of 2021 (Durairaj Dhanasekaran Vs. Union
of India and another), which took into consideration the earlier
judgment passed by this Court. The operative portion of the judgment
dated 26.03.2021 reads as under:
2. A Division Bench of this Court, in a batch of writ appeals, decided on October 9, 2020, in Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan and others v. Union of India and another, reported in (2020) 6 CTC 113 : (2020) 7 MLJ 641
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.909 of 2021
: 2020 SCC OnLine Mad 2958, allowed all the writ appeals and held that prior notice is necessary before disqualifying Directors under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and that the Registrar of Companies is not entitled to deactivate the Director Identification Number (DIN) for failure to file financial statements under applicable law and rules framed thereunder. The present writ appeal is squarely covered by the said judgment.
3.In view of the above, this writ appeal is allowed. No costs.
(M.M.S., J.) (R.N.M., J.)
26.04.2021
Index:Yes/No
mmi
To
1.Union of India
Rep. by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Shastri Bhawan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi - 110 001.
2.Registrar of Companies, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, Block No.6, B Wing, 2nd Floor, Shasthri Bhavan, 26, Haddows Road, Chennai - 6.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.909 of 2021
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
and R.N.MANJULA,J.
mmi
W.A.No.909 of 2021
26.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!