Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thiru.E.K.Sankar vs R.Venkatachalam
2021 Latest Caselaw 10583 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10583 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Thiru.E.K.Sankar vs R.Venkatachalam on 26 April, 2021
                                                                        Contempt Petition No.684 of 2020
                                                                                in W.P.No.18908 of 2019

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                    DATED: 26.04.2021

                                                            CORAM

                                          THE HON'BLE JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

                                             Contempt Petition No.684 of 2020
                                                in W.M.P.No.1074 of 2019
                                                 in W.P.No.18908 of 2019

                     Thiru.E.K.Sankar                            ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Respondent

                                                           -vs-
                     R.Venkatachalam                          ... Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner
                     Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
                     to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent / Management for
                     committing willful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in
                     W.M.P.No.1074 of 2019 in W.P.No.18908 of 2019 dated 31.01.2020.


                                     For Petitioner     :     M/s.V.Porkodi

                                     For Respondent     :     Mr.John Zachariah
                                                              For M/s.Fox Mandal & Associates

                                                           *****
                                                         ORDER

The Contempt Petition has been filed for punishing the respondents for

having not obeyed the orders of this Court dated 31.01.2020 in W.M.P.No.1074

of 2019 in W.P.No.18908 of 2019.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the

petitioner submitted that no amount can be recovered from the wages paid

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Contempt Petition No.684 of 2020 in W.P.No.18908 of 2019

under Section 17-B in the light of the decision reported in 2015 (4) SCC 334 in

the case of State of Punjab vs. Rafiq Masih and that the amount from March,

2020 has not been paid.

3. It is represented by Mr.John Zachariah, learned counsel appearing for

the Respondent that the excess amount has been paid as wages, which was

recovered from the salary of the petitioner and that the wages under Section

17-B has been paid upto February, 2020.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side.

5. The issue revolves around the payment of last drawn wages to the

Workman under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Of course,

it is true that there are judgments to the effect that wages under Section 17-B

should not be less than minimum wages and the question as to whether the

petitioner would be entitled to Rs.13,000/- or only Rs.7,000/- needs to be

decided while adjudicating the matter on merits depending upon the evidence

that may be produced at the time of final disposal of the Writ Petition. Section

17-B of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stipulates that in case the employer

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Contempt Petition No.684 of 2020 in W.P.No.18908 of 2019

prefers any appeal before the Higher Forum against the Award of

reinstatement passed by the Labour Court or Tribunal, it is mandatory that the

employer must pay full last drawn wages to the employee upto the age of

superannuation or till the disposal of the Writ Petition, whichever is earlier.

6. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

that the wrong payment of wages could not have been recovered in the

present circumstances and that the Management cannot recover the amount,

which was paid on account of their own fault.

7. According to the Management, even assuming that they succeed in

the Writ Petition, the Writ Petitioner would be entitled to gratuity for the

services rendered.

8. The Petitioner shall file an affidavit to the effect that in case he loses

in the Writ Petition or succeeds in the Writ Petition (in case of reinstatement),

the excess amount, if any, paid by the Management can be recovered or

S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., ar adjusted from gratuity and will not demand gratuity till the issue is resolved

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Contempt Petition No.684 of 2020 in W.P.No.18908 of 2019

and such an affidavit shall be filed within a period of one month from the date

of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to mention that the arrears of

17-B wages from March, 2020 to January, 2021 shall be paid to the petitioner

within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order

and the interest on gratuity, if any, will depend upon the result in the Writ

Petition.

9. With the above observation and discussion, the Contempt Petition is

closed. No costs.

26.04.2021 ar

Contempt Petition No.684 of 2020

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter