Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10520 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2021
CRP(NPD)No.966 of 2021
and CMP.No.7790 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
CRP(NPD)No.966 of 2021
and
CMP.No.7790 of 2021
F.Faruk John ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.K.Padmavathi
2.C.Banumathi
3.Chinnathayammal
4.Indhiragandhi
5.Shanthi
6.Kamala
7.Sakthivel Murugan ... Respondents
V.Sankar(deceased)
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India against the returned endorsement dated 05.04.2021, made in
REA.SR.No.550 of 2021 in REP.No.45 of 2011 in O.S.No.52 of 2005, on the
file of the III Additional District Court, Salem.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Neelakandan
For Respondents : No appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/4
CRP(NPD)No.966 of 2021
and CMP.No.7790 of 2021
ORDER
(This case has been heard through video conference)
There was an earlier Civil Revision Petition in CRP(PD)No.1979 of
2019, which had been filed by one V.Sankar, seeking direction to the III
Additional District Court at Salem to number the REA (SR) No.1469 of 2019
in REP No.45 of 2011 in O.S.No.52 of 2005.
2.That Civil Revision Petition came up for consideration before the
learned Single Judge of this Court vide order dated 14.09.2020 and observing
that the relief sought was to recognize and permit the revision petitioner to be
in possession as a tenant, the Civil Revision Petition was dismissed.
3.It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that after
the dismissal of the said Civil Revision Petition on 14.09.2020, the Judgment
debtor / Mr.V.Sankar unfortunately expired on 04.11.2020 this has given rise to
the present Revision Petitioner to claim further rights.
4.I hold that the Revision Petitioner herein is bound by the decree. He
claims to be a partner of the deceased V.Sankar. He cannot claim a better right
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
CRP(NPD)No.966 of 2021 and CMP.No.7790 of 2021
than the deceased V.Sankar. The said V.Sankar had been a party and had
exercised all his rights as a party defendant having been impleading as 6 th
defendant in the suit. The Revision Petitioner herein had not taken any steps to
assert his claim as a partner. It is very unfortunate that he takes advantage of
the death of the said partner and claims rights. Such conduct cannot be
accepted even otherwise, any decree passed as against the tenant / one partner
would also be binding on all the partners of the firm against which the decree
has been passed. The petitioner herein is bound by the decree.
4.I find no reason to interfere with the order passed. Accordingly, this
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. No order as to Cost.
23.04.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No ssi
To
The III Additional District Court, Salem.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
CRP(NPD)No.966 of 2021 and CMP.No.7790 of 2021
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.,
ssi
CRP(NPD)No.966 of 2021 and CMP.No.7790 of 2021
23.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!