Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anandhi vs Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By
2021 Latest Caselaw 10459 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10459 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Anandhi vs Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By on 23 April, 2021
                                                                                 W.P. No. 33928 of 2017

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 23.04.2021

                                                          CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. KIRUBAKARAN

                                                           AND

                              THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI

                                                  W.P. No. 33928 of 2017

                                                            &

                                                W.M.P. No. 37633 of 2017

                     Anandhi                                      ..Petitioner

                                                           Vs.


                     1.        Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by
                               its Principal Secretary,
                               Public Works Department,
                               Fort St. George, Chennai.

                     2.        The District Collector,
                               Kancheepuram District.

                     3.        The Thasildar,
                               Pallavaram Taluk Office,
                               Kancheepuram District.

                     4.        The Assistant Engineer,
                               Public Works Department,


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  W.P. No. 33928 of 2017

                               Water Resources Organisation,
                               Adyar Irrigation Division,
                               St. Thomas Mount, Chennai – 15.

                     5.        The Member Secretary,
                               Chennai Metropolitan Development
                                Authority,
                               Chennai.

                     6.        Casa Granda Builder Pvt. Ltd.,
                               Devi Apartments,
                               New No. 111, Old No. 59,
                               NPL, LB Road, Thiruvanmiyur,
                               Chennai – 600 041.
                               (R6 suo motu impleaded)                    ..Respondents


                     Prayer:         Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying

                     for issue of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 4th respondent

                     in proceedings bearing No.Adayar/E10 dated 31.05.2017 and to quash the

                     same as without jurisdiction.


                                     For Petitioner    ::    Ms.Subhashini for
                                                       Mr.R. Chandrasudan

                                     For Respondents ::    Mr.S. Kamalesh Kannan
                                                     Govt. Advocate for
                                                     R1 to R4
                                                     Mr. Raja Srinivas for R5
                                                        ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 33928 of 2017

The matter is heard through videoconferencing.

2. The petitioner has challenged Form III notice issued under the

Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachments Act, 2007

terming the petitioner as an encroacher, who is alleged to have created

encroachment on the water body Adyar River, comprised in S.No. 136,

Anakaputhur Village.

3. Ms. Subhashini, learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that the petitioner is in occupation of the property for years together

and based on a registered power of attorney dated 15.12.2006, had put up

construction already. According to the learned counsel for the petitoiner,

without following the procedure as contemplated in the judgment in

T.S. Senthilkumar V. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Others reported

in (2010) 3 MLJ 771, the respondent issued Form III notice without giving

an opportunity and directed the petitioner to vacate the property.

4. However, Mr. S.Kamalesh Kannan, learned Government

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 33928 of 2017

Advocate would submit that the writ petition has become infructuous since

after the writ petition was filed, Form II notice has been issued on

27.12.2017. He would further submit that the impugned Form III notice

should have been preceded by a Form II notice and the impugned notice is

only a second step in the process. Now, that Form II notice has been issued,

the petitioner has got a right to file objection to the Form II notice, which

has been issued on 27.12.2017.

5. Considering the submission made by the learned Government

Advocate, the petitioner shall file her objections to the Form II notice

issued. Though the time to file objection to the Form II notice has expired,

taking into consideration, the pendency of the writ petition, this Court

grants four weeks time from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to the

petitioner, to file her objection to the Form II notice dated 27.12.2017.

After considering the said objection, the 4th respondent shall pass

appropriate orders after giving a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner

within four weeks thereafter. Till the above exercise is completed, i.e, till

the order is passed by the 4th respondent on the objection to be filed by the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 33928 of 2017

petitioner to the Form II notice and served on the petitioner, the petitioner’s

possession shall not be disturbed.

N. KIRUBAKARAN,.J

AND

T.V. THAMILSELVI,J.

nv

6. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No

costs. Connected W.M.P.is closed.

(N.K.K.J.) (T.V.T.S.J.) nv 23.04.2021

To

1. The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.

2. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District.

3. The Thasildar, Pallavaram Taluk Office, Kancheepuram District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 33928 of 2017

4. The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organisation, Adyar Irrigation Division, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai – 15.

5. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Chennai.

N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.

AND

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 33928 of 2017

nv

W.P.No. 33928 of 2017

23.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter