Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Branch Manager vs Kesavan
2021 Latest Caselaw 10346 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10346 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2021

Madras High Court
The Branch Manager vs Kesavan on 22 April, 2021
                                                                       C.M.A.No.4663 of 2019

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED: 22.04.2021

                                                  CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                           C.M.A.No.4663 of 2019
                                                    and
                                           C.M.P.No.26484 of 2019
                 The Branch Manager,
                 The New India Assurance Co.Ltd,
                 Branch Office,
                 No.39-C, Byepass Road,
                 Dharmapuri – 636 701.                                 ... Appellant

                                                    Vs.

                 1.Kesavan
                 2.O.Periyasamy                                        ... Respondents

                       Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                 Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.06.2013
                 made in M.C.O.P.No.1578 of 2013, on the file of the Motor Accidents
                 Claims Tribunal, Krishnagiri.

                                       For Appellant   : Mr.Dhakshinamoorthy
                                       For Respondents : No appearance


                                                JUDGMENT

The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned Judgment and decree

dated 27.06.2013 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

Krishnagiri.

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 1 of 5 C.M.A.No.4663 of 2019

2.Though notice has been served on the contesting Respondent

No.1 who was the claimant before the Tribunal, there is no representation

on his behalf.

3.The learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company is

present and submits that the Tribunal erred in awarding a sum of

Rs.3,02,960/- has compensation to the 1st respondent/claimant by

considering the multiplier for the injury suffered by the appellant namely

fracture in tibia and fibula.

4.I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned

counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company.

5.In my view, the Tribunal has by and large arrived at a just

compensation under the following heads has detailed below:-

Loss earning capacity Rs.2,02,500/- Pain and sufferings Rs. 25,000/-

                              Nutrition                Rs. 10,000/-
                              Medical Bills            Rs.   2,310/-
                              Travel Bills             Rs.   6,150/-

Partial Loss of Income Rs. 27,000/-

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 2 of 5 C.M.A.No.4663 of 2019

Future Medical Rs. 20,000/-

Expenses Attender Charges Rs. 10,000/-

Total Rs.3,02,960/-

6.The Tribunal however ought not to have awarded a sum of

Rs.20,000/- towards future medical expenses. The nature of injuries

suffered by the 1st respondent do not indicate that there will be future

medical expenses though the injury resulted in disability and had

compromised the quality of life and his avocation as a Tailor. Under

these circumstances, the amount awarded by the Tribunal for a sum of

Rs.3,02,960/- is reduced by a sum of Rs.20,000/- awarded towards future

medical expenses.

7.The appellant/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

amount of compensation of Rs.2,82,960/- together with interest at 7.5%

per annum from the date of numbering of the claim petition till the date

of such deposit, less any amount already deposited by it, within a period

of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment.

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 3 of 5 C.M.A.No.4663 of 2019

8. On such deposit being made by the appellant/Insurance

Company, the 1st respondent/claimant is permitted to withdraw the same

together with interest accrued thereon, and costs less any amount already

withdrawn.

9.This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands Partly Allowed with the

above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous

Petition is also closed.

22.04.2021 jas Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order

To:

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Krishnagiri.

2.The V.R.Section, Madras High Court, Madras.

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 4 of 5 C.M.A.No.4663 of 2019

C.SARAVANAN, J.

jas

C.M.A.No.4663 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.26484 of 2019

22.04.2021

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 5 of 5

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter