Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.Vishnu vs Grip Well Tapes Pvt. Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 10082 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10082 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2021

Madras High Court
T.Vishnu vs Grip Well Tapes Pvt. Ltd on 20 April, 2021
                                                                              C.M.A.No.3729 of 2019

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 20.04.2021

                                                      CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                             C.M.A.No.3729 of 2019

                 T.Vishnu,
                 S/o.G.Thanickachalam                                         ... Appellant

                                                        Vs.
                 1.Grip Well Tapes Pvt. Ltd.,
                   No.22/57, Avadi Road,
                   Konimedu, Redhills,
                   Chennai – 600 052.
                 2.ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                   No.140, Nungambakkam High Road,
                   2nd Floor, Chottaiobhai Centre,
                   Chennai – 600 034.                                         ... Respondents

                       Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                 Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and decree dated 12.09.2018
                 made in M.C.O.P.No.555 of 2014, on the file of the Motor Accidents
                 Claims Tribunal (VI Court of Small Causes), Chennai.

                                   For Appellant     : Mr.K.Varadha Kamaraj
                                   For Respondents   :
                                   For R1            : No appearance
                                   For R2            : Mr.K.Poomalai

                                                     JUDGMENT

The claimant is the appellant in this appeal. In this appeal, the

appellant/claimant has sought for enhancement of compensation on the

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 1 of 6 C.M.A.No.3729 of 2019

ground that the Tribunal has considered a very low compensation

towards injuries suffered by the appellant/claimant.

2. By the impugned Judgement and decree, the Tribunal has

awarded a sum of Rs.1,61,000/- as compensation under the following

heads:-

Sl.No. Heads of Compensation Amount Awarded by the Tribunal

1. Disability Rs.60,000/-

2. Pain and sufferings Rs.25,000/-

3. Extra Nourishment Rs.10,000/-

4. Transport to Hospital Rs. 5,000/-

5. Damages to clothes Rs. 1,000/-

6. Attender Charges Rs. 2,400/-

7. Medical Expenses Rs.12,124/-

                        8.         Loss of Income           Rs.36,000/-
                        9.         Loss of Amenities        Rs.10,000/-
                                   Total                    Rs.1,61,524/-
                                                            Rounded off to Rs.1,61,600/-

3. The learned counsel for the appellant/claimant submits that the

Tribunal has awarded a meagre amount of Rs.36,000/- towards loss of

income for a period of three months. i.e., Rs.12,000x3=Rs.36,000/-. It is

further submitted that the Tribunal ought to have awarded some extra

amount towards loss of amenities and attender charges.

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 2 of 6 C.M.A.No.3729 of 2019

4. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/Insurance Company

on the other hand submits that the impugned Judgment and decree passed

by the Tribunal is well-reasoned and requires no interference.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the 2 nd

respondent. I have perused the impugned Judgment and decree and the

exhibits marked before the Tribunal.

6. In my view, the Tribunal has moreoreless awarded a just

compensation considering the injuries suffered by the appellant/claimant.

7. Considering nature of injuries suffered by the

appellant/claimant, this Court is inclined to enhance the compensation by

fixing the notional income of the appellant/claimant as Rs.16,000/- per

month. The nature of injuries would have put him out of action atleast

for a period of six months. Considering the same, the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of income is enhanced to

Rs.80,000/-, (Rs.16,000/-x6 = Rs.80,000/-). Therefore, the amount

awarded towards attender charges is also enhanced by another sum of

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 3 of 6 C.M.A.No.3729 of 2019

Rs.7,600/- and towards loss of amenities is enhanced to Rs.25,000/- by

adding another sum of Rs.15,000/-.

8. Therefore, this Court is inclined to enhance the compensation as

follows:-

                                   Heads and calculation                    Amount
                     Disability
                                                                          Rs.    75,000/-
                     Pain & sufferings                                    Rs.    25,000/-
                     Extra Nourishment                                    Rs.    10,000/-
                     Transportation Charges                               Rs.      5,000/-
                     Damages to Clothes                                   Rs.      1,000/-
                     Attender Charges                                     Rs.    10,000/-
                     Medical Expenses                                     Rs.    12,124/-
                     Loss of Income                                       Rs.    80,000/-
                     Loss of Amenities                                    Rs.    25,000/-
                                              Total                        Rs.2,43,124/-
                                                                          Rounded off to
                                                                           Rs.2,43,200/-



9. The 2nd respondent/Insurance Company is therefore directed to

deposit the enhanced amount of compensation of Rs.2,43,200/- together

with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of numbering of the claim

petition till the date of such deposit, less any amount already deposited

by it, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 4 of 6 C.M.A.No.3729 of 2019

this Judgment.

10. On such deposit being made by the 2nd respondent/Insurance

Company, the appellant/claimant is permitted to withdraw the same

together with interest accrued thereon, less any amount already

withdrawn in the same proportion as was ordered by the Tribunal.

11. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands partly allowed with the

above observations and directions. No costs.

20.04.2021

arb Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order

To:

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, VI Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madras High Court.

C.SARAVANAN, J.

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 5 of 6 C.M.A.No.3729 of 2019

arb

C.M.A.No.3729 of 2019

20.04.2021

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 6 of 6

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter