Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Javed @ Jabbi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 3122 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3122 MP
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Javed @ Jabbi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 March, 2026

          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:25294




                                                               1                           MCRC-13865-2026
                              IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT JABALPUR
                                                        BEFORE
                                       HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEVNARAYAN MISHRA
                                                   ON THE 31st OF MARCH, 2026
                                            MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 13865 of 2026
                                                JAVED @ JABBI AND ANOTHER
                                                           Versus
                                               THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           Appearance:
                                   Shri Amit Kumar Sharma - Advocate for the applicants.
                                   Ms. Smita Kehri - Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.
                                   Shri Yogendra Tiwari - Advocate for the respondent/objector.

                                                                   ORDER

This is the first application filed by the applicants under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.104/2026 registered at Police Station Gadhakota, District Sagar, for the offence punishable under Sections 331(6), 296-B, 115(2), 351(3), 324(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that on the report

of the applicant party, a counter case has also been registered as Crime No.103/2024 (Annexure-A/2), in which, it is alleged that on 15.02.2026 at about 10.30 pm, Nasir @ Sanu was standing near Nagina Masjid, then a dispute arose between Chotu @ Jaheer, Javed @ Jabbi, Sohil, Hameed, Parvej and Mehmood and on that, Nasir asked his brothers to return home. Subsequently, Mehmood started abusing Nasir, whereas Hameed assaulted

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:25294

2 MCRC-13865-2026 him. Learned counsel for the applicants has also submitted that after lodging the FIR by the applicant party, the complainant party had lodged the FIR. In the dispute, the applicants had also suffered the injuries. None of the applicants or victims had suffered any grievous injury. Only the offence of house trace-passing is a non-bailable offence, but rest of the offences are bailable, hence, the applicants be given the benefit of anticipatory bail.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent/objector has opposed the anticipatory bail application and submitted that co-accused Danish had already been externed from entering into the district, but violating that order, he was present on the spot along with Javed @ Jabbi, Sohil Khan and Nasir. All the accused persons armed with lathi and danda, entered into the house of Abid Khan, abused him and also assaulted his family members. The

applicants have criminal record, hence, no case of anticipatory bail is made out. If the applicants are released on anticipatory bail, then they will repeat the offence. According to him, the application deserves to be dismissed.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State has also opposed the anticipatory bail application and submitted that applicant No.1 Javed @ Jabbi has criminal record of four cases whereas applicant No.2 Sohil Khan has also the criminal record, though the same is not received with her, hence, no case of anticipatory bail is made out.

5. Heard the parties and perused the case diary.

6. Looking to the factual aspects of the case, coupled with the facts that both the parties were present on the spot, a cross-case has also been registered, except the offence of house trace-passing, rest of the offences are

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:25294

3 MCRC-13865-2026 bailable, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the applicants on anticipatory bail. Thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

7. It is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicants shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each with one solvent surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/trial Court for their appearance before the concerned during the course of investigation or during trial Court, as the case may be.

8. The applicants are directed to cooperate with the investigating agency and if required by the police, also appear on the date and time directed by the Investigating Officer.

9. It is further directed that the applicants shall abide by all the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS.

10. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.

(DEVNARAYAN MISHRA) JUDGE

dm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter