Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mangal Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 2812 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2812 MP
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Mangal Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 March, 2026

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
                                                               1                           MCRC-11287-2026
                             IN        THE     HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                      AT INDORE
                                                         BEFORE
                                       HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
                                                   ON THE 20th OF MARCH, 2026
                                             MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 11287 of 2026
                                                      MANGAL SINGH
                                                           Versus
                                               THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                          Appearance:
                                  Shri Avinash Yadav - Advocate for the petitioner [P-1].

                                  Shri Viraj Godha - Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

                                                                   ORDER

1. This third application has been filed by applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for grant of regular bail in connection with Crime No.765 of 2025 registered at Police Station-Station Road, District Ratlam (M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 331(4), 305(1), of the BNS, 2023. The applicant is in judicial custody since 29.09.2025. His first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 14.11.2025 passed in M.Cr.C. No.50552/2025 and the second

application was dismissed was withdrawn vide order dated 02.02.2026 passed in MCRC No.4547of 2026.

2. Heard the arguments.

3. Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application, case diary and the relevant material on record.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds

2 MCRC-11287-2026 mentioned in the application, submits that the applicant is falsely implicated in the alleged offence. He has not committed the alleged offence. Further, no incriminating material connecting the applicant with the alleged offence is seized from the applicant. The offence is triable by JMFC. The final report has been submitted on completion of investigation. The trial would take time to conclude. There is no likelihood of tampering with evidence by the applicant. Jail incarceration is causing hardship to the applicant and the dependent family. Applicant is ready to cooperate in the trial.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the application on the ground of gravity of alleged offence. Learned counsel further refers to 08 criminal antecedents against applicant as mentioned in the case diary. The applicant is aged around 28 years, he is labourer by profession.

6. In reply, learned counsel for the applicant submit that all other matters are pending for trial. The applicant has never been convicted for any offence.

7. According to the material available on case diary, unknown offenders committed theft of cash Rs.96,500/-, inter box machine, motorola mobile phone and a black colour bag from Noble International Academy School, Mhow in the night of 15.09.2025 and 16.09.2025. Applicant was arrested on 29.09.2025. He is in custody ever since. Cash of Rs.8,000/- and one iron tommy was recovered at the instance of the applicant. The offence is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. The veracity of prosecution and complicity of the applicant will be determined after evidence in the trial.

8. As informed, the applicant has family responsibility of aged

3 MCRC-11287-2026 parents. Considering these aspects, there appears to be no possibility of fleeing from justice. In absence of previous conviction for any offence, considering the socio-economic status of the applicant, there appears to be no likelihood of tampering with evidence or influencing the witnesses by the applicant. The offence is triable by JMFC. There appears to be no compelling reason to continue incarceration of the applicant. However, the observations, herein-above, are recorded for present application only.

9. Considering the rival contentions and overall circumstances of the case, in the light of aforestated facts, but without commenting on the merits, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail, however, on stringent conditions in view of his multi-state criminal antecedents. Thus, the application is allowed.

10. Accordingly, it is directed that applicant - Mangal Singh shall be released on bail in connection with Crime, as mentioned in first paragraph of this order, subject to furnishing cash deposit of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand Only) and a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One lakh only) with one surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for compliance with the following conditions : (For convenience of understanding by accused and surety, the conditions of bail are also reproduced in Hindi as under):-

(1) Applicant shall remain present on every date of hearing as may be directed by the concerned court;

(1) आवेदक संबंिधत यायालय के िनदशानुसार सुनवाई क येक ितिथ पर उप थत रहे गा । (2) Applicant shall not commit or get involved in any offence; (2) आवेदक केाई अपराध नह ं करे गा या उसम स मिलत नह ं होगा । (3) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer;

4 MCRC-11287-2026 (3) आवेदक करण के त य से प रिचत कसी य को य या अ य प से लोभन, धमक या वचन नह ं दे गा, जससे ऐसा य ऐसे त य को यायालय या पुिलस अिधकार को कट करने से िनवा रत हो ।

(4) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly attempt to tamper with the evidence or allure, pressurize or threaten the witness;

(4) आवदे क य या अ य प से सा य के साथ छे डछाड करने का या सा ी या सा य को बहलाने-फुसलाने, दबाव डालने या धमकाने का यास नह ं करे गा । (5) During trial, the applicant shall ensure due compliance of provisions of Section 309 of Cr.P.C./346 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regarding examination of witnesses in attendance;

(5) वचारण के दौरान, उप थत गवाह से पर ण के संबंध म आवेदक धारा ३०९ दं . .सं./ ३४६ भारतीय नाग रक सुर ा सं हता, 2023 के ावधान का उिचत अनुपालन सुिन त करे गा । (6) The applicant shall mark his presence before the SHO, P.S.- Station Road, District Ratlam (M.P.) on first Saturday of every month till conclusion of trial. A copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned SHO for compliance with the case diary.

11. This order shall be effective till the end of trial. However, in case of breach

of any of the preconditions of bail, the Trial Court may consider, on merit, cancellation of bail without any impediment of this order.

12. The trial Court shall get these conditions reproduced on the personal bond by the accused and on surety bond by the surety concerned. If any of them is unable to write, the scribe shall certify that he had explained the conditions to the concerned accused or the surety.

C.C. as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE

sumathi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter