Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Kumar @ Kallu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 737 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 737 MP
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Ram Kumar @ Kallu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 January, 2026

Author: Avanindra Kumar Singh
Bench: Avanindra Kumar Singh
                                                              1                                  CRR-1534-2011
                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                       AT JABALPUR
                                                       CRR No. 1534 of 2011
                                           (RAM KUMAR @ KALLU Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )



                           Dated : 23-01-2026
                                 Shri R.P. Dwivedi - Advocate for the applicant.
                                 Ms. Garui Pathak - Advocate for the respondent/State.

Heard on admission.

Revision petition is admitted for final hearing. Record received in connected case.

Heard on I.A.No.1523/2025, which is second application under Section 438 of B.N.S.S., 2023 for suspension of remaining jail sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of applicant Ram Kumar @ Kallu.

The applicant is aggrieved of the judgment dated 17.08.2011 passed by the learned Session Judge, District Dindori (M.P.) in CRA No.07/2011 arising out of the judgment dated 11.01.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, District Dindori in case No.624/2008, whereby, applicant Ram Kumar @ Kallu has been convicted for offence under Section 304(A) of IPC and sentence him R.I. for 1 year and fine of 200/- with default

stipulation.

It is seen that the learned counsel for the applicant has mentioned incorrect facts in the application by stating that the applicant was in jail from 12.11.2025 to 19.01.2026 total period of jail sentence is six months 1 month and seven days.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not aware of the

2 CRR-1534-2011 exact date on which the accused was sent to jail. However, from the order sheet of this Court, it is evident that on 12.11.2025, directions were issued for issuance of a non‑bailable warrant, and on 02.01.2026, the applicant was produced before this Hon'ble Coordinate Bench from jail, District Dindori, and was thereafter remanded back to jail.

Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that if applicant is not released on bail, then the purpose of filing this revision would become futile. Therefore, it is prayed that execution of jail sentence of the applicant be suspended and he be released on bail.

Learned Penal Lawyer for the respondent/State on the other hand support the impugned judgment and opposes the prayer for suspension of sentence.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

After perusal of the record and hearing the arguments, the fact that final hearing of this revision may take time, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it proper to suspend the jail sentence of the applicant. Consequently, I.A. No.1523/2026 is allowed.

It is directed that on depositing of fine amount, if not already deposited and on furnishing personal bond to the tune of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court with a further direction to appear before the Registry of this Court on 29.01.2026 and also on such other dates, as may be fixed by the Registry, the execution of remaining part of the jail sentence of applicant shall remain suspended and he be released on bail till final disposal

3 CRR-1534-2011 of this revision. Under Section 446 of Cr.P.C. he shall deposit Rs. 1,000/- in the Trial Court, out of the forfeiture of personal bond.

Applicant shall follow the conditions of Section 438 (3) for suspension of sentence as under:-

(a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;

(b) that such person shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and,

(c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence, and may also impose, in the interests of justice, such other conditions as it considers necessary.

List the case for final hearing in due course.

C.C. as per rule.

(AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE

NRJ

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter