Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dharmendra @ Bablu Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1943 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1943 MP
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Dharmendra @ Bablu Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 February, 2026

           NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:15862




                                                               1                             CRA-1648-2026
                             IN    THE       HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                   AT JABALPUR
                                                        BEFORE
                                      HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI
                                                ON THE 24 th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                               CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1648 of 2026
                                            DHARMENDRA @ BABLU YADAV
                                                       Versus
                                      THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                          Appearance:
                            Shri Surendra Kumar Rajak - Advocate for appellant.
                            Smt. Vineeta Sharma - Dy. G.A. for State.

                                                                ORDER

The appellant has filed this first criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 being aggrieved by order dated 03.02.2026 passed in B.A. No.313/2026 by the Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, District Jabalpur (M.P.), whereby his bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, has been rejected.

2. The appellant has been arrested on 07.01.2026 relating to FIR/Crime No.04/2026 registered at Police Station Khamariya, District Jabalpur, (M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 119(1), 296, 115(2), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(da), 3(2)(dha) and 3(1)(va) of the SC/ST Act.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the present appellant that except the offence under Section 119(1) of BNS, other offences are not more than 7 years of punishment. As many as two injuries in the forma of abrasion and contusion have been found on the person of the victim, which are simple in nature. The present appellant has been falsely implicated in this case. Though as many as 26 other offence have been registered against him, out of

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:15862

2 CRA-1648-2026 which, in 17 cases he has been acquitted. Details of those cases have been mentioned in the appeal memo. The remaining cases are pending against him but he has been falsely implicated in those cases also. He is in custody since 07.01.2026. He has a good case on merit. He is ready to comply with the conditions as may be imposed by this Court. The conclusion of trial will take considerable time. In view of the aforesaid submissions, it is prayed that the present appellant may be released on bail.

4. Per contra , learned counsel for State has opposed the prayer of bail and prayed for rejection of appeal.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the attending facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

inclined to release the appellant on bail. Thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the appeal is allowed and it is directed that the appellant be released on bail upon his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.70,000/- (Rupees Seventy Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Committal Court.

7. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the appellant:-

"i) The appellant shall comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

ii) The appellant shall cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

iii) The appellant shall not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:15862

3 CRA-1648-2026 may be;

iv) The appellant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

v) The appellant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

vi) The appellant shall not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;

vii) The appellant shall mark his presence before the concerned Police Station once in a fortnight till conclusion of the trial; and

viii) If any of the aforesaid conditions is violated, then this order shall loose its effect automatically."

8. Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance by the office of this Court.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI) JUDGE

ac/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter