Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Irfan vs State Of M P
2026 Latest Caselaw 1842 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1842 MP
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Irfan vs State Of M P on 20 February, 2026

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:5283




                                                             1                           MCRC-4347-2026
                              IN    THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT INDORE
                                                        BEFORE
                                      HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
                                                ON THE 20 th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                             MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4347 of 2026
                                                             IRFAN
                                                             Versus
                                                          STATE OF M P
                           Appearance:
                                 Shri Khuzema Kapadia - Advocate for the applicant.
                                 Shri Bhaskar Agrawal - Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

                                 Shri Kunal Dewada - Advocate for the respondent [COMP].

                                                              ORDER

This first application has been filed by applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for grant of regular bail in connection with Crime No.630/2025 registered at Police Station- Badnagar, District- Ujjain (M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 316 (2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 . Applicant is in judicial custody since 08.10.2025.

Heard the arguments.

Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application, case diary and the relevant material on record.

Learned counsel for the applicant in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application contends that it is a case of business transaction and purely civil in nature. The complainant had executed an agreement regarding renting the vehicle. No offence, as alleged, is committed by the

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:5283

2 MCRC-4347-2026 applicant. The final report has been submitted on completion of investigation. There is no likelihood of tampering with evidence by the applicant. The trial would take time to conclude. Jail incarceration is causing hardship to the applicant and the dependent family. Applicant is ready to cooperate in the trial Per contra, learned counsel for the State, ably assisted by learned counsel for the objector opposes the application on the gravity of the offence. Learned counsel further refers to 09 criminal antecedents of the applicant, as mentioned in the case diary. The applicant is aged around 32 years. He is a Driver by profession.

In reply, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has

filed judgments of acquittal alongwith I.A. No. 1983/2026 and I.A. No. 2246/2026. Applicant was acquitted in Crime No. 131/2012, 729/2012, 394/2013, 182/2014, 205/2014, 799/2014, 250/2019, 246/2020, 21/2022. The matters at Crime No. 135/2022 and 445/2025 are pending for trial. Applicant has never been convicted for any offence.

As per the accusation on case diary, the applicant induced complainant Sabir Khan to rent his vehicle to the accused Irfan. Later, applicant has worked as Driver of Sabir Khan and took his vehicle bearing registration no. MP 09 DL 7584. Applicant did not return the vehicle and fled away. On such allegations P.S. Badnagar registered FIR for offence punishable u/S 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 against the applicant. The final report has been filed on completion of investigation. The contentions advanced by the applicant have prima-facie merit and cannot be dismissed as manifestly

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:5283

3 MCRC-4347-2026 baseless. The veracity of the prosecution and complicity of the applicant in the alleged offence will be considered after evidence in trial.

As informed, the applicant responsibilities of aged parents and family. Considering these aspects, there appears to be no possibility of fleeing from justice. In absence of any previous conviction for any offence, considering the socio-economic status of the applicant, there appears to be no likelihood of recidivism or tampering with evidence or influencing the witnesses by the applicant. The trial would take time to conclude. There appears to be no compelling reason to continue incarceration of the applicant. However, the observations, herein-above, are recorded for present application only.

Considering the rival contentions and overall circumstances of the case, in the light of aforestated facts, but without commenting on the merits, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. Thus, the application is allowed.

Accordingly, it is directed that applicant- Irfan shall be released on bail in connection with Crime, as mentioned in first paragraph of this order, upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac only) with one surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for compliance with the following conditions : (For convenience of understanding by accused and sureties, the conditions of bail are also reproduced in Hindi as under):-

(1) Applicant shall remain present on every date of hearing as may be directed by the concerned court;

(1) आवेदक संबंिधत यायालय के िनदशानुसार सुनवाई क येक ितिथ पर उप थत रहे गा । (2) Applicant shall not commit or get involved in any offence of similar nature;

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:5283

4 MCRC-4347-2026 (2) आवेदक समान कृ ित का केाई अपराध नह ं करे गा या उसम स मिलत नह ं होगा । (3) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer;

(3) आवेदक करण के त य से प रिचत कसी य को य या अ य प से लोभन, धमक या वचन नह ं दे गा, जससे ऐसा य ऐसे त य को यायालय या पुिलस अिधकार को कट करने से िनवा रत हो (4) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly attempt to tamper with the evidence or allure, pressurize or threaten the witness;

(4) आवदे क य या अ य प से सा य के साथ छे डछाड करने का या सा ी या सा य को बहलाने- फुसलाने, दबाव डालने या धमकाने का यास नह ं करे गा ।

(5) During trial, the applicant shall ensure due compliance of provisions of Section 309 of Cr.P.C./346 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regarding examination of witnesses in attendance;

(5) वचारण के दौरान, उप थत गवाह से पर ण के संबंध म आवेदक धारा ३०९ दं . .सं./ ३४६ भारतीय नाग रक सुर ा सं हता, 2023 के ावधान का उिचत अनुपालन सुिन त करे गा ।

This order shall be effective till the end of trial. However, in case of breach of any of the preconditions of bail, the trial Court may consider, on merit, cancellation of bail without any impediment from this order.

The trial Court shall get these conditions reproduced on the personal bond by the accused and on surety bond by the surety concerned. If any of them is unable to write, the scribe shall certify that he/she had explained the conditions to the concerned accused or the surety.

I.A. No(s). 1596/2026, 1597/2026, 1983/2026,1984/2026, 2031/2026, 2245/2026 and 2246/2026 stands disposed off.

C.C. as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE

sh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter