Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ishwar Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1658 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1658 MP
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2026

[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Ishwar Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 February, 2026

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4917




                                                                1                            MCRC-7848-2026
                              IN        THE    HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                      AT INDORE
                                                          BEFORE
                                        HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
                                                 ON THE 17th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                              MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 7848 of 2026
                                                        ISHWAR SINGH
                                                            Versus
                                                THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           Appearance:
                                   Shri Manish Kumar Vijaywargiya - Advocate for the applicant..

                                   Shri Sunit Kapoor GA for the State.

                                                                    ORDER

1. This fifth application has been filed by applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for grant of regular bail in connection with Crime No.178/2024 registered at Police Station - Sarangpur, District Rajgarh(M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 294, 342, 323, 506, 34, 365, 326, 307 of IPC. Applicant is in judicial custody since 27.03.2024. Earlier bail applications of the applicant have been dismissed as withdrawn.

2. Heard the arguments.

3. Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application, case diary and the relevant material on record.

4. Learned Counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter due to previous enmity. He has not committed the alleged offence. The material prosecution witnesses including the injured complainant have been examined. The medical officer had opined that none of the injury was found on

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4917

2 MCRC-7848-2026 vital part of the body of the injured. There is no likelihood of tampering with

remaining evidence by the applicant for the reason that he is not capable to influence the police witness. Jail incarceration is causing hardship to the applicant and the dependent family. Co-accused Manish and Satyanarayan has been extended benefit of bail vide order dated 28.10.2025, passed in M.Cr.C. No.43690/2025 and vide order dated 14/11/2025 passed in MCRC no.50880/2025 respectively. Applicant is ready to cooperate in the trial.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the application on the ground of gravity of alleged offence. However, on going through the case diary, he fairly states that no criminal antecedent is reported against the applicant.

6. According to the material on the case diary, the applicant and other co-accused assaulted Kamal Singh with wooden stick. The police station

Sarangpur registered FIR initially for offence punishable under Section 294, 342, 323, 506 and 34 of IPC. The injured Kamal was forwarded for medico legal examination. On x-ray examination, fracture of forearm and finger was revealed. The prosecution for offence punishable under sections 365, 326 and 307 of IPC was added. The applicant was arrested on 27.03.2024. He is in custody ever since. No incriminating material was seized from the applicant. The veracity of prosecution and intention of the applicant will be determined after evidence in trial. 11 prosecution witnesses have been examined. 8 prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. The trial would take time to conclude.

7. As informed, the applicant is aged around 28 years(as per arrest memo). He is labourer by profession and has responsibility of family. Considering these aspects, there appears to be no possibility of fleeing from justice. In absence of criminal antecedent, there appears to be no likelihood of tampering with evidence or influencing the remaining witnesses by the applicant.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4917

3 MCRC-7848-2026

There appears to be no compelling reason to continue incarceration of the applicant. .Co-accused Manish and Satyanarayan have been extended benefit

of bail. The prosecution against applicant is similar in nature. However, the observations, herein-above, are recorded for present application only

8. Considering the rival contentions and overall circumstances of the case, in the light of aforestated facts, but without commenting on the merits, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. Thus, the application is allowed.

9. Accordingly, it is directed that applicant-Ishwar Singh shall be released on bail in connection with Crime, as mentioned in first paragraph of this order, upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, for compliance with the following conditions : (For convenience of understanding by accused and surety, the conditions of bail are also reproduced in Hindi asunder):-

(1) Applicant shall remain present on every date of hearing as may be directed by the concerned court; (1) आवेदक संबंिधत यायालय के िनदशानुसार सुनवाई क येक ितिथ पर उप थत रहे गा । (2) Applicant shall not commit or get involved in any offence of similar nature; (2) आवेदक समान कृ ित का केाई अपराध नह ं करे गा या उसम स मिलत नह ं होगा । (3) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer;

(3) आवेदक करण के त य से प रिचत कसी य को य या अ य प से लोभन, धमक या वचन नह ं दे गा, जससे ऐसा य ऐसे त य को यायालय या पुिलस अिधकार को कट करने से िनवा रत हो (4) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly attempt to tamper with the evidence or allure, pressurize or threaten the witness;

(4) आवदे क य या अ य प से सा य के साथ छे डछाड करने का या सा ी या सा य को बहलाने- फुसलाने, दबाव डालने या धमकाने का यास नह ं करे गा ।

(5) During trial, the applicant shall ensure due compliance of provisions of Section 309 of Cr.P.C./346 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regarding examination of witnesses in attendance; (5) वचारण के दौरान, उप थत गवाह से पर ण के संबंध म आवेदक धारा ३०९ दं . .सं./ ३४६ भारतीय नाग रक सुर ा सं हता, 2023 के ावधान का उिचत अनुपालन सुिन त करे गा ।

10. This order shall be effective till the end of trial. However, in case of breach of any of the preconditions of bail, the trial Court may consider, on merit, cancellation of bail without any impediment from this order.

11. The trial Court shall get these conditions reproduced on the personal

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4917

4 MCRC-7848-2026 bond by the accused and on surety bond by the surety concerned. If any of them is unable to write, the scribe shall certify that he had explained the conditions to the concerned accused or the surety.

C.C. as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE

amol

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter