Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Through Mother Of Petitioner Suman Bai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1572 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1572 MP
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Through Mother Of Petitioner Suman Bai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 February, 2026

Author: Pranay Verma
Bench: Pranay Verma
          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4711




                                                              1                              WP-5620-2026
                             IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT INDORE
                                                        BEFORE
                                          HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA
                                               ON THE 16th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                                WRIT PETITION No. 5620 of 2026
                                     THROUGH MOTHER OF PETITIONER SUMAN BAI
                                                      Versus
                                     THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                          Appearance:
                             Ms. Aparna, learned counsel for the petitioner.

                                                                  ORDER

The petitioner X has filed the present petition through legal guardian (Mother) for termination of her pregnancy.

2. As per the petitioner, she is a young girl of 21 years of age. She was engaged with a person but before their marriage could be solemnized he committed suicide. Before that she had cohabitated with her fiance. Now after his death situation is that the petitioner being not highly educated and not financially well placed and her mother being Class-IV contractual employee in Municipal Corporation she has no financial capability to raise

the child. She is unmarried hence the pregnancy will cause grave loss not only to the petitioner but even to the child if permitted to be born. Her mental condition is totally unstable and she is not able to take care of herself. Thus in view of the same, she will not be able to take care of the child.

3. This Court by order dated 11.02.2026 and subsequently by order dated 13.02.2026 had directed the Medical Board for furnishing opinion as to

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4711

2 WP-5620-2026 whether the pregnancy of the petitioner can be terminated. In pursuance thereof, a report dated 14.02.2026 has been received from the Head of Department, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology M.T.H. Hospital, MGMMC - Indore, wherein it has been categorically stated that the petitioner X is medically fit for the procedure of termination of pregnancy as advised by the Medical Board. Along with the report, the documents of the Medical Board have also been annexed from which it is observed that the petitioner was medically examined and it has been observed that there is no medical contraindication for planned termination of pregnancy. From medical side she is fit for termination of pregnancy.

4. Section 3 and 5(1) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 reads as under:-

"3. When Pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner-

(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4711

3 WP-5620-2026 exceed twelve weeks' if such medical practitioner is, or

(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twelve weeks but does not exceed twenty weeks, if not less than two registered medical practitioners are of opinion, formed in good faith, that,-

(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury physical or mental health ; or

(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped.

Explanation 1.-Where any, pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by such pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

Explanation 2 .-Where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any married woman or her husband for the purpose of limiting the number of children, the anguish caused by such unwanted pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

(3) In determining whether the continuance of

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4711

4 WP-5620-2026 pregnancy would involve such risk of injury to the health as is mentioned in sub-section (2), account may be taken of the pregnant woman's actual or reasonable foreseeable environment.

(4) (a) No pregnancy of a woman, who has not attained the age of eighteen years, or, who, having attained the age of eighteen years, is a lunatic, shall be terminated except with the consent in writing of her guardian.

(b) Save as otherwise provided in C1.(a), no pregnancy shall be terminated except with the consent of the pregnant woman. 5. Sections 3 and 4 when not to apply.- (1) The provisions of Sec.4 and so much of the provisions of sub-section (2) of Sec. 3 as relate to the length of the pregnancy and the opinion of not less than two registered medical practitioner, shall not apply to the termination of a pregnancy by the registered medical practitioner in case where he is of opinion, formed in good faith, that the termination of such pregnancy is immediately necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman."

5. This Court keeping in view the statutory provisions as contained in The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971 is of the opinion that in the peculiar facts and circumstance of the case, the pregnancy can be

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:4711

5 WP-5620-2026 terminated and it is ordered accordingly.

6. The HOD, M.T.H. Hospital, Indore is directed to carryout the termination of pregnancy. The petitioner 'X' shall appear before the HOD, M.T.H. Hospital, Indore on 17.02.2026 at 11.00 A.M. The Head of Department of Gynecologist, Head of Department of Anesthesia and all other specialist will remain present at the time of termination of pregnancy, as the petitioner 'X is of tender age. Not only this, after termination of pregnancy is carried out, the State of Madhya Pradesh shall ensure post operative care of the petitioner 'X'. The entire expenditure in respect of termination of pregnancy shall be borne by the State of M.P. through Collector, Indore and the DNA of fetus shall also be preserved for DNA analysis.

7. With the aforesaid, the present writ petition stands allowed.

(PRANAY VERMA) JUDGE

jyoti

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter