Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hariram Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1363 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1363 MP
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Hariram Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 February, 2026

          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:11756




                                                              1                            MCRC-4845-2026
                              IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT JABALPUR
                                                        BEFORE
                                       HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEVNARAYAN MISHRA
                                                ON THE 10th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                             MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4845 of 2026
                                                     HARIRAM AHIRWAR
                                                           Versus
                                               THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           Appearance:
                                   Shri Prakhar Naveriya - Advocate for the applicant.
                                   Shri Naveen Thakur - Government Advocate for the respondent/State.

                                                                  ORDER

This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant of regular bail relating to FIR/Crime No.427/2025 registered at Police Station Baldevgarh, District Tikamgarh, for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant is in jail since 23.12.2025.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. As per prosecution case,

there was a love affair between the applicant's daughter and son of deceased and because of that, on 22.06.2022, the applicant's daughter returned her marriage party and marriage could not be solemnized. In relation to the said incident, there were strained relations between the applicant and the deceased. It is alleged that the applicant and his wife had assaulted the deceased and on that, vide Crime No.372/2022, an FIR was registered

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:11756

2 MCRC-4845-2026 against them on 29.06.2022. Subsequently, the applicant and his wife again assaulted the deceased and being humiliated with their conduct, the deceased committed suicide by consuming poisonous substance. On that basis, merg was registered and autopsy was conducted over the dead body. The viscera was sent for analysis and on that, pyrethrum pesticide was found in the visceral organs. After making enqury on the merg, a case has been registered against the applicant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that though the deceased might have been assaulted by the applicant and his wife, but they never intended or having any intention that the deceased would commit suicide. According to him, from the material available on record, no case of abetment to commit suicide is made out against the applicant. Trial will take

time to be concluded, hence, the applicant be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the bail application and has submitted that from the material available on record, it is clear that time and again, the applicant and his wife abused and assaulted the deceased and being harassed with that, she committed suicide, hence, no case of bail is made out.

5. Heard the parties and perused the case diary.

6. From the material available on record, it appears that the deceased committed suicide on 29.06.2022, but after the merg enquiry, the FIR of the incident was lodged on 12.12.2025 that too after a gap of about three years and five months alleging therein that the applicant and his wife had abetted the deceased to commit suicide. No sufficient explanation for lodging the

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:11756

3 MCRC-4845-2026 FIR belatedly has been given.

7. Looking to the aforesaid factual aspects of the case, coupled with the fact that trial will take time to be concluded, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the applicant on bail. Thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

8. It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his appearance before the said Court on all such dates as may be fixed by that Court in this regard during pendency of trial.

9. It is further directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 480(3) of BNSS.

10. Accordingly, Misc. Criminal Case stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.

(DEVNARAYAN MISHRA) JUDGE

dm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter