Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jay Narayan Gurjar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1222 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1222 MP
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Jay Narayan Gurjar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 February, 2026

Author: Milind Ramesh Phadke
Bench: Milind Ramesh Phadke
           NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:4938




                                                           1                            MCRC-6176-2026
                            IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                  AT GWALIOR
                                                      BEFORE
                                    HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
                                              ON THE 6 th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                          MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 6176 of 2026
                                                 JAY NARAYAN GURJAR
                                                        Versus
                                            THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                         Appearance:
                                 Shri Alok Kumar Sharma - Advocate for the applicant.

                                 Shri Mohit Shivhare - GA for the respondent/State.

                                                               ORDER

This is first bail application under Section 483 of BNSS filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 24.01.2026 in connection with Crime No.22/2026 registered at Police Station- Dharnavada, District Guna for offence punishable under Sections 8/21 and 29 of NDPS Act.

As per the prosecution case, a total quantity of 11.30 grams of smack has been seized from the possession of co-accused Kishan @ Chhotu and the

applicant has been made accused on the basis of memorandum of co-accused Kishan @ Chhotu.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged. It is further submitted that the applicant has been arrayed as an accused solely on the basis of a memorandum statement recorded under

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:4938

2 MCRC-6176-2026 Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, which by itself does not constitute substantive evidence. There is no independent corroboration connecting the applicant with the alleged offence. The trial is likely to take considerable time to conclude. The applicant is a permanent resident of District Bhind and there is no likelihood of the applicant absconding, tampering with prosecution evidence, or influencing witnesses. The applicant undertakes to abide by all terms and conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is prayed that the applicant may kindly be enlarged on bail.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposed the application and prayed for its rejection submitting that the present applicant has criminal history of one case.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegations coupled with the fact that the trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre- trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court for his appearance on the dates given by the concerned Court.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:4938

3 MCRC-6176-2026 This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4. The applicant shall not commit any other offence during pendency of the trial, failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically, without further reference to the Bench;

5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance. Certified copy as per rules.

(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE

neetu

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter