Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tripta Anand vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1181 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1181 MP
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Tripta Anand vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 February, 2026

Author: Vishal Mishra
Bench: Vishal Mishra
                                                                1                                    WP-3903-2026
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT JABALPUR
                                                        WP No. 3903 of 2026
                                       (TRIPTA ANAND Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS )



                           Dated : 05-02-2026
                                 Shri Jitesh Shrivastava - Advocate for petitioner.
                                 Shri V.S. Choudhary - Govt. Advocate for respondents/State.

Petitioner's counsel has submitted that in identical circumstances, this Court in WP No. 2483 of 2026 (Sunil Sahu and others vs State of Madhya Pradesh and others) while issuing notices has granted interim relief vide

order dated 28.01.2026 in the following terms :

"Issue notice to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven working days by RAD mode failing which this petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Shri Swapnil Ganguly - Advocate appears on advance notice on behalf of the respondents No. 3 and 4 and prays for a short time to enable him to seek instructions in the matter. Heard on the question of interim relief.

Counsel appearing for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to the order dated 1.4.2025 passed in WP No.15327/2014, operative part of the order is as under :-

"5. In view of same, Collector Jabalpur is directed to carry out survey in the area of protected monument and if encroachment is found in any prohibited area i.e. by mining, digging or doing any civil constructions then notices be issued to all encroachers found in the area and after receiving objections if encroachment is found in prohibited area then same shall be removed by the Collector Jabalpur immediately. If required police force may also be used by the Collector for removing encroachments if same is found to be illegal within the periphery of prohibited area. Archaeological Survey of India is directed to fence the area so that there may not be any encroachment. Further Archaeological Survey of India with Secretary, Forest and Secretary, Tourism may also see ways to plant trees to make the area green and preserve. Steps taken be informed to Registrar General, High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur within a period of 30 days and action taken report be put up before the Court."

2 WP-3903-2026 It is argued that the inspection has been carried out behind the back of the petitioner and a joint inspection report has been submitted on 14.11.2025, wherein the petitioner and other have been found to be encroacher in the property in question. Now, the notice impugned herein, has been issued directing for removal of the encroachment. It is argued that no opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioner as ordered by this Court in the order dated 1.4.2025.

If the order passed in earlier round of litigation is perused, it is clearly mentioned therein that if the encroachment is identified, then they are required to issue notices to all the encroachers found in the area and after receiving objections, if encroachment is found in prohibited area then same shall be removed by the Collector, Jabalpur immediately. The said part of the order is not being complied with by the authorities.

Under these circumstances, the notice dated 8.1.2026 (Annexures- P/1 and P/2) issued by the respondent No. 4 will not be given effect to till the next date of hearing.

On the prayer made by counsel appearing for the respondents No. 3 and 4, list this matter after two weeks to enable him to file reply in the matter.

His name be reflected in the cause list.

List along with Writ Petition No.2202/2026 for analogous hearing after two weeks."

It is submitted that the petitioner is identically situated; therefore, petitioner's counsel prays for similar relief in the matter. The same order/notice is put to challenge herein.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner is entitled for the similar interim relief as has been granted in WP No. 2483 of 2026 vide order dated 28.01.2026.

Therefore, issue notice to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven working days by RAD mode, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Considering the aforesaid, the impugned notice dated 08.01.2026 (Annexure P/1) issued by the respondent No. 4 will not be given effect to, till

3 WP-3903-2026 the next date of hearing.

List along with WP No. 2483 of 2026 for analogous hearing.

(VISHAL MISHRA) JUDGE

VV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter