Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Madhusudan Prajapat @ Toni vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1006 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1006 MP
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Madhusudan Prajapat @ Toni vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 February, 2026

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:3315




                                                               1                             MCRC-4400-2026
                              IN     THE       HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                      AT INDORE
                                                        BEFORE
                                      HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
                                                 ON THE 2 nd OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                             MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4400 of 2026
                                               MADHUSUDAN PRAJAPAT @ TONI
                                                           Versus
                                               THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           Appearance:
                                   Shri Rishiraj Trivedi - Advocate for the applicant.

                                   Shri Ayushyaman Choudhary - Govt. Advocate for the
                           respondent/State.

                                                                   ORDER

This first application has been filed by the applicant under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No. 439/2025 registered at Police Station - Piploda, District Ratlam(M.P.) for offence punishable under Section 8/22 and 8/29 of NDPS Act. Applicant is in judicial custody since 29.11.2025.

Heard the arguments.

Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application and the relevant material on record.

Learned counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that the applicant is falsely implicated in the alleged offence merely on suspicion. There is non compliance of due procedure of search

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:3315

2 MCRC-4400-2026 and seizure. He has not committed the alleged offence. The final report has been submitted. There is no likelihood of tampering with evidence by the applicant. Jail incarceration is causing hardship to the applicant and his dependent family. Applicant is ready to cooperate in the trial.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the application on the ground of gravity of alleged offence. Learned counsel refers to 01 criminal antecedents of the applicant as mentioned in the case diary. Applicant is aged 34 years. He is a Chowkidar by profession.

In reply, learned counsel submits that applicant was acquitted in vide judgment dated 12.12.2023 passed RCT No. 174/2019 for offence punishable u/S 323, 294, 506 of IPC. No prosecution is pending against the applicant. He has

never been convicted for any offence.

According to the material available on case diary, ASI Kailash Birana of P.S. Piploda intercepted one Apache motorcycle near Sukheda Mandi on 28.11.2025 to verify secret information. Applicant Madhushan was driving the motorcycle.On personal search, narcotic contraband suspected to be MD - total quantity 10 grams was recovered from left pocket of pant of Madhusudan. The applicant was arrested on 29.11.2025 Applicant is in custody ever since. The trial would take time to conclude. The chemical analysis report submitted by RFSL, Ratlam reveals that the sample of contraband contains methyl meth cathinone (mephedrone)MD. The veracity of prosecution and compliance with procedure will be determined after evidence in trial.

As informed, the applicant has responsibility of his dependent family. Considering these aspects, there appears to be no possibility of fleeing from

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:3315

3 MCRC-4400-2026 justice. In absence of any criminal antecedent, considering the socio-economic status of the applicant, there appears to be no likelihood of recidivism or tampering with evidence or influencing the witnesses by the applicant. There appears to be no compelling reason to continue incarceration of the applicant. However, the observations, herein-above, are recorded for present application only.

Considering the rival contentions and overall circumstances of the case, in the light of aforestated facts, but without commenting on the merits, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. Thus, the application is allowed.

Accordingly, it is directed that applicant- Madhusudan Prajapat alias Toni shall be released on bail in connection with Crime as mentioned in first paragraph of this order, upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, for compliance with the following conditions : (For convenience of understanding by accused and surety, the conditions of bail are also reproduced in Hindi as under):-

(1) Applicant shall remain present on every date of hearing as may be directed by the concerned court;

(1) आवेदक संबंिधत यायालय के िनदशानुसार सुनवाई क येक ितिथ पर उप थत रहे गा ।

(2) Applicant shall not commit or get involved in any offence of similar nature; (2) आवेदक समान कृ ित का केाई अपराध नह ं करे गा या उसम स मिलत नह ं होगा ।

(3) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer;

(3) आवेदक करण के त य से प रिचत कसी य को य या अ य प से लोभन, धमक या वचन नह ं दे गा, जससे ऐसा य ऐसे त य को यायालय या पुिलस अिधकार को कट करने से िनवा रत हो

(4) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly attempt to tamper with the evidence or allure, pressurize or threaten the witness;

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:3315

4 MCRC-4400-2026 (4) आवदे क य या अ य प से सा य के साथ छे डछाड करने का या सा ी या सा य को बहलाने- फुसलाने, दबाव डालने या धमकाने का यास नह ं करे गा ।

(5) During trial, the applicant shall ensure due compliance of provisions of Section 309 of Cr.P.C./346 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regarding examination of witnesses in attendance;

(5) वचारण के दौरान, उप थत गवाह से पर ण के संबंध म आवेदक धारा ३०९ दं . .सं./ ३४६ भारतीय नाग रक सुर ा सं हता, 2023 के ावधान का उिचत अनुपालन सुिन त करे गा ।

This order shall be effective till the end of trial. However, in case of breach of any of the preconditions of bail, the trial Court may consider, on merit, cancellation of bail without any impediment from this order.

The trial Court shall get these conditions reproduced on the personal bond by the accused and on surety bond by the surety concerned. If any of them is unable to write, the scribe shall certify that he/she had explained the conditions to the concerned accused or the surety.

C.C. as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE sh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter