Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jitendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 3348 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3348 MP
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Jitendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 April, 2026

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9266




                                                              1                          MCRC-13359-2026
                              IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                     AT INDORE
                                                       BEFORE
                                     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
                                                    ON THE 7 th OF APRIL, 2026
                                            MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 13359 of 2026
                                                      JITENDRA SINGH
                                                           Versus
                                               THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           Appearance:
                                   Shri Shobhit Gupta - Advocate for the applicant.

                                   Shri Bhaskar Agrawal - Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

                                                                  ORDER

This first application has been filed by the applicant under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No. 554/2026 registered at Police Station - Excise Circle, Ghatiya, District Ujjain(M.P.) for offence punishable under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act, 1915. Applicant is in judicial custody since 14.03.2026.

Heard the arguments.

Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application and the

relevant material on record.

Learned counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that the applicant is falsely implicated in the alleged offence merely on suspicion. The dhaba wherefrom, the illicit liquor was recovered does not belong to him. The illicit liquor was not seized from the active, conscious, direct and immediate possession of the applicant.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9266

2 MCRC-13359-2026 He has not committed the alleged offence. Investigation is almost complete. Further custodial interrogation of the applicant is not needed in the matter. There is no likelihood of tampering with evidence by the applicant. Jail incarceration is causing hardship to the young applicant and his dependent family. Applicant is ready to cooperate in further investigation/trial.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the application on the ground of gravity of alleged offence.However, after going through the case diary, he fairly states that no criminal antecedent is reported against the applicant. Applicant is aged around 24 years. He is a labourer by profession.

According to the accusation on case diary, police team of Excise Circle, Ujjain conducted a raid at Baba Dhaba of applicant on 14.03.2026 on the basis of secret information. On search of dhaba, country made plain and

masala liquor - total 60.48 bulk litres was recovered from two Vimal bags. The illicit liquor was seized in due compliance with the procedure. The P.S. - Excise Circle Ujjain registered FIR for offence punishable under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act against Jitendra Singh. Applicant was apprehended on the spot. He is in custody ever since. The trial would take time to conclude. The veracity of prosecution and complicity of the applicant will be determined after evidence in the trial.

As informed, the applicant has the responsibility of dependent family. Considering these aspects, there appears to be no possibility of fleeing from justice. In absence of any criminal antecedents, considering the socio- economic status of the applicant, there appears to be no likelihood of recidivism or tampering with evidence or influencing the witnesses by the

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9266

3 MCRC-13359-2026 applicant. The offence is triable by JMFC. There appears to be no compelling reason to continue incarceration of the young applicant. However, the observations, herein-above, are recorded for present application only.

Considering the rival contentions and overall circumstances of the case, in the light of aforestated facts, but without commenting on the merits, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. Thus, the application is allowed.

Accordingly, it is directed that applicant- Jitendra Singh shall be released on bail in connection with Crime, as mentioned in first paragraph of this order, upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for compliance with the following conditions : (For convenience of understanding by accused and surety, the conditions of bail are also reproduced in Hindi as under):-

(1) Applicant shall remain present on every date of hearing as may be directed by the concerned court; (1) आवेदक संबंिधत यायालय के िनदशानुसार सुनवाई क येक ितिथ पर उप थत रहे गा । (2) Applicant shall not commit or get involved in any offence of similar nature; (2) आवेदक समान कृ ित का केाई अपराध नह ं करे गा या उसम स मिलत नह ं होगा । (3) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer;

(3) आवेदक करण के त य से प रिचत कसी य को य या अ य प से लोभन, धमक या वचन नह ं दे गा, जससे ऐसा य ऐसे त य को यायालय या पुिलस अिधकार को कट करने से िनवा रत हो । (4) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly attempt to tamper with the evidence or allure, pressurize or threaten the witness;

(4) आवदे क य या अ य प से सा य के साथ छे डछाड करने का या सा ी या सा य को बहलाने- फुसलाने, दबाव डालने या धमकाने का यास नह ं करे गा ।

(5) During trial, the applicant shall ensure due compliance of provisions of Section 309 of Cr.P.C./346 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regarding examination of witnesses in attendance; (5) वचारण के दौरान, उप थत गवाह से पर ण के संबंध म आवेदक धारा ३०९ दं . .सं./ ३४६ भारतीय नाग रक सुर ा सं हता, 2023 के ावधान का उिचत अनुपालन सुिन त करे गा

This order shall be effective till the end of trial. However, in case of

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9266

4 MCRC-13359-2026 breach of any of the preconditions of bail, the trial Court may consider, on merit, cancellation of bail without any impediment from this order.

The trial Court shall get these conditions reproduced on the personal bond by the accused and on surety bond by the surety concerned. If any of them is unable to write, the scribe shall certify that he/she had explained the conditions to the concerned accused or the surety.

C.C. as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE

sh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter