Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Jyoti Chakrawarty vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 9982 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9982 MP
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Smt Jyoti Chakrawarty vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 October, 2025

Author: Vishal Mishra
Bench: Vishal Mishra
          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:50962




                                                                    1                                    WP-32024-2024
                                IN    THE       HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                      AT JABALPUR
                                                           BEFORE
                                             HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA
                                                     ON THE 8 th OF OCTOBER, 2025
                                                   WRIT PETITION No. 32024 of 2024
                                                SMT JYOTI CHAKRAWARTY
                                                          Versus
                                        THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                Shri Durgesh Singrore - Advocate for petitioner.
                                Shri Abhishek Singh - Govt. Advocate for respondents/State.

                                                                        ORDER

This petition is filed seeking the following reliefs :

(i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari/ mandamus by quashing the impugned order Annexure P-1 dt. 18/03/2024 and directing the respondents to hand over the vehicle bearing Registration No. MP 20 CK 8028 on Supurdnama to the petitioner in the interest of justice.

(ii) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this petition Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper also be awarded.

2. It is argued that a criminal case is pending consideration before the trial Court and despite the same, vide order dated 18.03.2024, confiscation proceedings were drawn and petitioner's application for Supurdginama of the vehicle bearing Registration No. MP-20-CK-8028 was rejected. It is

submitted that the vehicle in question cannot be confiscated during the pendency of trial arising out of Crime No. 66 of 2023 registered at P.S. Excise Circle Mandla for the offence under Section 34(1)(2) of the M.P. Excise Act.

3. It is pointed out that the aforesaid issue was considered by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ramlal Jhariya vs State of M.P. and others

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:50962

2 WP-32024-2024 : WP No. 11356 of 2024 decided on 21.04.2025 wherein it is observed as under :

"96. Therefore, the questions referred to us in the matter of jurisdiction to pass confiscation order during pendency of criminal proceedings under M.P. Excise Act, 1915 and Cow Progeny Act are answered in the following manner :

A. Section 47-A of M.P. Excise Act conferring authority on the Collector to pass order for confiscation is declared ultra vires being disproportionately violative of Articles 19(1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India. Therefore, question of confiscation by the Collector during pendency of criminal trial no longer survives in the matter, as order for confiscation can now be passed only by the Criminal Court trying the offence in terms of sections 46 and 47 thereof. As a necessary consequence thereto, Section 47-D would become inoperative in all cases where confiscation orders have not been passed as yet, having rendered superfluous.

B. For cases under Cow Progeny Act, the Collector/District Magistrate shall be competent to initiate proceedings for confiscation during pendency of criminal trial, but no confiscation order can be passed before conclusion of criminal trial and the Collector/District Magistrate would be empowered to confiscate the vehicle only if conviction is recorded in criminal trial and involvement of vehicle and knowledge/connivance of the owner is proved in the criminal trial. C. Writ petition is maintainable once an order is passed by the Collector/District Magistrate confiscating the vehicles by exercising powers under the provisions of M.P. Excise Act, 1915 and in case of Cow Progeny Act, if it is passed before conclusion of trial, because it will be without jurisdiction."

4. State counsel has fairly submits that the matter is squarely covered by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Ramlal Jhariya (supra) and the authorities were having no jurisdiction to pass the confiscation order pending criminal case.

5. Under these circumstances, the impugned order dated 18.03.2024 being unsustainable is hereby quashed. The petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application regarding Supurdginama of the vehicle in question

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:50962

3 WP-32024-2024 before the competent Court.

6. In above terms, the petition stands allowed and disposed of finally. No order as to costs.

(VISHAL MISHRA) JUDGE

VV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter