Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Govind Shakyawar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 5272 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5272 MP
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Govind Shakyawar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 March, 2025

Author: Anand Pathak
Bench: Anand Pathak
          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:5624




                                                                 1                            MCRC-45660-2024
                              IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT GWALIOR
                                                   BEFORE LOK ADALAT
                                            HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK
                                                             &
                                              HARISH DIXIT, SENIOR ADVOCATE
                                                    ON THE 8 th OF MARCH, 2025
                                            MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 45660 of 2024
                                                 GOVIND SHAKYAWAR
                                                       Versus
                                      THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                              Shri Ashirbad Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
                              Shri A.K.Nirankari, learned Government Advocate for respondent/State.

                              Shri Akhilesh Gupta, learned counsel for complainant.

                                                                     ORDER

1. The present petition is preferred under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR registered at Police Station Madhoganj, District Gwalior in connection with Crime No.384/2024.

2. It appears that parties are agreed to settle the matter and they want to settle the matter once and for all. They filed applications vide

I.A.No.22662/2024 and I.A.No.22665/2024 under Section 359(1) of BNSS to settle the matter by way of compromise. Both the parties have appeared before the Principal Registrar of this Court on 12.11.2024 to ink-down their identity and intent. The Principal Registrar of this Court has duly verified the intent and signatures of parties. The report in this regard is attached. The same is perused and it appears that compromise has been reached between the parties voluntarily without any threat, inducement and coercion.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:5624

2 MCRC-45660-2024

3. Learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State has no objection if both the parties want to settle the dispute by way of compromise.

4. Learned counsel for the complainant also supports the prayer of petitioner for compromise. He referred the statement of complainant given before the Principal Registrar of this Court that she is ready to settle the matter once and for all.

5. A Lean Compromise is better than a Fat Law Suit, instant efforts of the parties indicate the same. It is expected that their bonafide gestures would continue.

6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of judgments Jagdish Channa & others Vs. State of Haryana & another, AIR 2008 SC 1968, Madan Mohan

Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 2008 SC 1969, Shiji Vs. Radhika & Another, (2011) 10 SCC 705, Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Parbatbhai Ahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another, (2017) 9 SCC 6 41, laid down that even in non- compoundable cases on the basis of compromise, criminal proceedings can be quashed so that valuable time of the court can be saved and utilized in other material cases.

7. Considering the submissions and taking into account the law laid down by the Apex Court, in the opinion of this Court, continuance of trial in such matter will be a futile exercise which will serve no purpose. Under such a situation, Section 528 of BNSS can be justifiably invoked to prevent abuse

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:5624

3 MCRC-45660-2024 of the process of law and wasteful exercise by the courts below.

8. Thus, in the interest of justice, applications vide I.A.No.22662/2024 and I.A.No.22665/2024 are allowed, the prayer made by the parties is hereby accepted because no fruitful purpose would be served in continuation of trial. Thus, parties are permitted to compound the offences by way of compromise.

9. Resultantly, the petition is disposed of in the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties. FIR registered at Crime No.384/2024 at Police Station Madhoganj, District Gwalior against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 296, 115(2), 351(2) of BNS as well as all the consequential criminal proceedings arising out the said crime number is hereby quashed.

10. Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.

11. Certified copy as per rules.

                                     (ANAND PATHAK)                                  (HARISH DIXIT)
                                        MEMBER                                          MEMBER
                           Ashish*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter