Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narendra Arya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 3210 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3210 MP
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Narendra Arya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 January, 2025

                                                             1                                CRA-7918-2024
                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                        AT INDORE
                                                       CRA No. 7918 of 2024
                                            (NARENDRA ARYA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )



                           Dated : 23-01-2025
                                 Shri Vivek Singh, learned senior counsel with Shri Juned Ahmed
                           Khan, learned counsel for the appellant.
                                 Shri Virendra Khadav, learned counsel for the respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.

2. The present criminal appeal is admitted for final hearing.

3. Also heard on I.A. No.15585/2024 , which is the First application for suspension of remaining jail sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of the applicant -Narendra Arya.

4. The applicant has been convicted under Section 304(B) IPC and sentenced to undergo 7 years' R.I. and under Section 498 (A) of IPC and sentenced to undergo 2 years' R.I. with fine of Rs.5000/- with default stipulation.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Trial Court has not appreciated the evidence in its right perspective. Omnibus allegations have been levelled against the appellant. There are material contradictions and omissions in the statements of the witnesses and other three co-accused have been acquitted. Impugned judgment suffers from surmises and conjectures and has been passed ignoring serious anomalies. The appellant has fair chances of success in this criminal appeal. Final hearing of this appeal may take time as the appeal is of the year 2024. On these miscellaneous grounds, he prays for suspension of

2 CRA-7918-2024

remaining part of the jail sentence of the appellant till pendency of this appeal.

6 . Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent / State opposes the prayer on the ground that sufficient evidence are available against the applicant and prays for rejection of the application.

7 . Considering the aforesaid factual backdrop, all the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that possibility of final hearing of this appeal in near future is bleak, without expressing any conclusive opinion on merits, I find it to be a fit case to suspend the remaining custodial sentence of the appellant.

8. Accordingly, I.A. No.15585/2024 is allowed. Subject to deposit of fine amount, if not already deposited the remaining jail sentence during the pendency of the appeal is hereby suspended and it is directed that appellant be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for compliance with following -

(i) The appellant shall deposit the amount of fine (if not deposited) forthwith;

(ii) The appellant shall appear before the Trial Court on 04/03/2025 and on such further dates as may be directed by the Trial Court;

(iii) The appellant shall ensure hearing of the appeal on the date fixed for such hearing and shall also ensure proper legal representation on his behalf, on the date notified for hearing.

9. In case of breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, this order

3 CRA-7918-2024 granting suspension of sentence shall become ineffective. The Trial Court shall be authorized to grant exemption from attendance to the appellant on any date, on sufficient cause being shown [Chapter XIII Rule 42 Sub-Rule 2 of the M.P. High Court Rules, 2008].

10. Where the appellant does not appear on the date of his appearance before the Trial Court and no sufficient cause for non-appearance is shown, the Trial Court shall be authorized to issue non-bailable / bailable warrants to secure his attendance under intimation to the Registry of High Court.

11. The Trial Court shall also proceed under Section 446 of Cr.P.C. / Section 491 of BNSS, 2023 against such appellant and his surety without any reference to this Court and without any impediment of the order granting bail. [Chapter XIII Rule 42 Sub-Rule 3 of M.P. High Court Rules, 2008].

12. On arrest / surrender in compliance with the warrant, the appellant shall be forwarded in custody to undergo sentence of imprisonment under intimation to the Registry of this Court.

13. I.A. No.15587/2024, an application for urgent hearing also stands disposed of.

14. Registry is directed to list the matter for final hearing in due course.

Certified copy as per rules.

(BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI) JUDGE

N.R.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter