Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3164 MP
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:1265
1 WP-40486-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA
ON THE 22nd OF JANUARY, 2025
WRIT PETITION No. 40486 of 2024
SMT. AJAB KUWAR YADAV
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Devendra Kumar Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Ravindra Dixit - Government Advocate for the State.
ORDER
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-
"i- That, a direction may kindly be given to the respondents to give the benefit of regular/minimum pay scale of the post on which the Husband of Petitioner was working and classified as permanent employees in compliance of order passed by learned labour court dated 06.09.2001 and pay the difference of arrears on fixation of pay from the date of classification along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat.
ii- Respondents may kindly be directed to grant the benefit of regular pay scale and the benefit as extended in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat from the date of classification of petitioner along with all the consequential benefits.
Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted."
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:1265
2 WP-40486-2024
2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that husband of petitioner was working on the post of Gauge Reader. By order dated 23/03/2011, he was classified. Ultimately, he was conferred the status of Sthaikarmi in the light of Viniyamatikaran scheme. Husband of petitioner retired on 01/07/2022 and he has expired on 26/08/2023. However, the minimum of pay-scale as directed by Supreme Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat Vs. Ashwini Ray and Ors., reported in (2017) 3 SCC 436 , was not paid to her husband from the order of classification till the conferment of status of Sthaikarmi. Accordingly, it is prayed that respondents be directed to pay the minimum of pay-scale in the light of judgment passed by Supreme Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat (supra) .
3. Per contra, the petition is vehemently opposed by counsel for the State.
4. Heard the learned counsel for parties.
5. Although, it is submitted by counsel for petitioner that husband of petitioner was conferred the status of Sthaikarmi in the light of Viniyamatikaran scheme, but there is no specific pleading to that effect.
6. Be that whatever it may be.
7. There is no reason to disbelieve the statement of counsel for petitioner that husband of petitioner was conferred the status of Sthaikarmi. Accordingly, in the light of judgment passed by Supreme Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat (supra), it is directed that in case if petitioner makes a fresh representation for payment of minimum of pay-scale from the order of classification till the conferment of status of Sthaikarmi, then the respondents after verifying as to whether the aforesaid pay-scale was ever paid to husband of petitioner or not, shall pay the minimum of pay-scale from the order of classification till the conferment of status of Sthaikarmi.
8. Let the said decision be taken within a period of three months from the
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:1265
3 WP-40486-2024
date of filing of fresh representation.
9. With aforesaid observation, the petition is finally disposed of.
(G. S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE
PjS/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!