Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjeev @ Chotu Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 3145 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3145 MP
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Sanjeev @ Chotu Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 January, 2025

Author: Anand Pathak
Bench: Anand Pathak
                                                               1


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT GWALIOR
                                                   CRA No. 7365 of 2022
                                    (SANJEEV @ CHOTU AHIRWAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )


                          Dated: 22-01-2025
                                Shri A.K. Jain-Advocate for appellant.
                                Shri    D.S.    Kushwaha-Additional       Advocate      General    for
                          respondent/State.

I.A. No.13382/2022, an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act is taken up, considered and allowed for the reasons mentioned therein. The delay of 115 days in filing the instant appeal is hereby condoned.

Heard on I.A.No.7396/2024, first application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail on behalf of appellant-Sanjeev alias Chotu Ahirwar.

Learned counsel for respondent/State raised the objection that learned counsel for appellant after filing of this application, filed another application for suspension of sentence vide I.A.No.12627/2024 on behalf of present appellant. It is beyond apprehension why these two applications have been filed repeatedly.

At this stage, learned counsel for appellant regretfully submits that due to inadvertence, he did this. He prays for withdrawal of I.A. No.7396/2024. He also regrets for this practice adopted by him in many other cases also. He undertakes that he shall not adopted this practice in future.

Considering the submission and the apology tendered by learned counsel for appellant, I.A. No.7396/2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Further heard on I.A.No.12627/2024, second repeat application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail on behalf of appellant-Sanjeev alias Chotu Ahirwar.

This criminal appeal assails the judgment dated 02/03/2022 passed in Special Case No.07/2021 by Special Judge (POCSO Act), District Datia (M.P.) whereby present appellant has been convicted as under:

                               Section               Imprisonment                      Fine
                          5(L)/6 of POCSO          Life Imprisonment         Rs.20,000/-          with
                                 Act                                         default stipulation.
                              366 of IPC               7 Years R.I.          Rs.5,000/- with default
                                                                             stipulation.
                              363 of IPC               3 Years R.I.          Rs.3,000/- with default
                                                                             stipulation.

It is the submission of learned counsel for appellants that the trial Court erred in convicting and awarding jail sentence to present appellant. He has already suffered around 3 years and 11 months' incarceration as pre and post trial detention. It is further submitted that prosecutrix was at the cusp of attaining majority and that aspect has been ignored. It is a case of consent prima facie. She left her matrimonial home on her own volition and shared emotional and physical proximity with consent. She lived with appellant for one month without raising any alarm. He undertakes to abide by all terms and conditions as imposed by this Court. Appellant has good case on merits and final hearing of appeal would take some time. Under such circumstances, learned counsel for appellant prays for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to present appellant.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the application and prayed for its dismissal.

Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the

parties, this Court intends to allow the application for suspension of sentence (I.A.No.12627/2024).

If appellant-Sanjeev alias Chotu Ahirwar furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) along with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court that he shall appear before the Principal Registrar of this Court on 27/03/2025 and thereafter, on all other subsequent dates as may be fixed by the Office for appearance, then he shall be released on bail and execution of jail sentence is suspended till disposal of this appeal, subject to deposit of fine amount.

Appellant shall not be source of embarrassment and harassment to the complainant/victim side in any manner and he shall not move in their vicinity.

I.A.12627/2024 stands disposed of, accordingly. Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for information and necessary compliance.

Certified copy as per rules.

                                (Anand Pathak)                                    (Hirdesh)
                                     Judge                                         Judge

(Dubey)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter