Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jitendra Nagal vs Ashok
2025 Latest Caselaw 6423 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6423 MP
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Jitendra Nagal vs Ashok on 22 August, 2025

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
                                  1



NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:23178




 IN THE              HIGH COURT                 OF MADHYA PRADESH

                                      AT I N D O R E

                                           BEFORE

         HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR

                          ON THE 22nd OF AUGUST, 2025

                          FIRST APPEAL No. 1062 of 2023

                                   JITENDRA NAGAL

                                            Versus

                                ASHOK AND OTHERS

Appearance:
         Shri Pramod C. Nair - Advocate for the appellant.
         Shri Shubham Santani - Advocate for the respondent no.1 to 4.
                                           ORDER

Heard on I.A. No. 4571/2025, an application under order XXIII Rule 3 r/W Section 151 of CPC.

2. The Registrar of the Bench has submitted verification report in furtherance of the order dated 23.06.2025. The Registrar has reported that the appellant - Jitendra Nagal, respondent no.1 Ashok, respondent no.3 - Sarita and respondent no.4 - Jyoti had appeared and verified the factum of compromise. Respondent no.2 - Abhay Kumar did not appear before the Registrar. Appellant no.2 and respondent no.1, 3 and 4 have stated on affi- davit that they have entered into compromise without any undue influence, coercion and out of their free will.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:23178

3. The present first appeal is filed feeling aggrieved by the judg- ment and decree dated 22.02.2023 passed in Civil Suit No. RCS 300042A/2015. The appellant/plaintiff - Jitendra Nagal had filed suit for specific performance of contract on the basis of agreement to sale dated 02.06.2014 executed by the defendant no.1 - Ashok for himself and general power of attorney of defendant no.2.Abhay Kumar, Sarita - defendant no.3 and Jyoti - defendant no.4 with regard to land comprised in Survey No. 4/2/6 admeasuring 0.110 hectare, Survey no. 171/23 admeasuring 0.210 hectare, Survey No. 171/1 admeasuring 0.160 hectare, Survey No. 174/4 ad- measuring 0.295 hectare, Survey No.176/2 admeasuring 0.030 hectare, Sur- vey No. 175/1 admeasuring 0.455 hectare, Survey No. 175/2 admeasuring 0.070 hectare, Survey No. 175/6 admeasuring 0.150 hectare total land 1.480 hectare of Village Rajgarh Distt. Ratlam. The trial Court vide impugned judgment(para 81) concluded that the plaintiff has entered into agreement with defendant no.1 with regard to Survey No. 4/2/6 Area 0.110 hectare and Survey No. 171/23 Area 0.210 hectare. Plaintiff had failed to prove the agreement to sale with regard to land comprised in other survey numbers as pleaded in the plaint(para1). The trial Court further concluded that plaintiff had failed to prove readiness and willingness in performance his part of con- tract. Therefore, the relief of specific performance of contract was denied. Feeling aggrieved by the finding of the trial Court, the present first appeal is filed.

4. Both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and agreed to enter into a partnership agreement for construction of Housing Project, ex- cluding defendant no.2/respondent no.2 - Abhay Pipada. However, Abhay has consented to the settlement between the parties. He had signed the com-

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:23178

promise application and submitted affidavit in support of the compromise application.

5. Learned counsel further referring to Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC submits that the parties have entered into compromise with regard to part of the subject-matter of the suit. Therefore, compromise may be consid- ered.

6. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 to 4 supports the compromise application.

7. Heard, both the parties and perused the record.

8. The terms of settlement between the parties appears to be vol- untary and lawful. Both the parties have entered into compromise to amica- bly settle the dispute with regard to disputed property and filed written and signed compromise application.

9. Considering these aspects of the matter I.A. No. 4571/2025, an application for compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and Section 151 of CPC is allowed and a decree is passed in terms of compromise petition as stated in para 4 of the compromise application.

"बब) यह कक, उपररोकक्‍त समसक्‍त सरर क्रमममांक ककी भभमम मम ससे मसरर्फ सरर क्रमममांक 171/23 कक रकबम 0.1882 हसेकक्‍टर, 174/4/2 कक रकबम 0.2254 हसेकक्‍टर, 175/1/3 कक रकबम 0.3719 हसेकक्‍टर ककी ककल रकबम 0.7855 हसेकक्‍टर अरमर्फक्‍त 84500 ररर्फकरक्‍ट भमभ म हही अपपीलमरर्थी एरमां प्रतयरर्थी कसे मधय समझझौक्‍तम ककयम जम रहम हहै शसेष भभमम अपपीलमरर्थी छरोड़ रहसे हह।

सब) यह कक, उकक्‍त समझझौक्‍तसे कसे अमांक्‍तरर्फक्‍त अपपीलमरर्थी एरमां प्रतयरर्थीययों कसे मधय उकक्‍त भभमम पर एक आरमसपीय बहकममांजजलम भरन करो (मलक्‍टही) वरकमसक्‍त प्ररोजसेकक्‍ट करनसे कम समझझौक्‍तम ककयम जम रहम हहै जजसकसे अमांक्‍तरर्फक्‍त अपपीलमरर्थी एरमां प्रतयरर्थीययों कसे मधय एक पमांजपीककक्‍त भमरपीदमरही रमर्फ कम ननममर्फण ककयम जमरसेरम।

डब) यह कक, उकक्‍त समझझौक्‍तसे कसे अमांक्‍तरर्फक्‍त ननममर्फक्‍त ककी जमनसे रमलही पमांजपीककक्‍त भमरपीदमरही रमर्फ ककी समसक्‍त शक्‍तर्तों एरमां ननयमयों कम उललसेख पमांजपीककक्‍त भमरपीदमरही रमर्फ मम ककयम जमयसेरम।

ई) यह कक, प्रतयरर्थीययों ककी भमभ म करो उकक्‍त समझझौक्‍तसे कसे अमांक्‍तरर्फक्‍त ननममर्फक्‍त ककी जमनसे रमलही भमरपीदमरही रमर्फ मम जमम ककी जमरसेरपी एरमां भभमम ककी ककीमक्‍त करो पभमांजपी कसे रूप मम रणनम कर भमरपीदमरही

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:23178

रमर्फ मम सभपी प्रतयरर्थीययों कम हहससम रूपययों एरमां प्रनक्‍तशक्‍त दरोनयों कसे ममन ससे दशमर्फयम जमयसेरम समर हही अपपीलमरर्थी दरमरम प्रतयरर्थी शपी अशरोक वपक्‍तम शपी ममणकलमल जपी वपपमडम करो पभरर्फ मम हदयसे रयसे रूपयसे 75,00,000/- (वपचरोतक्‍तर लमख) करो अपपीलमरर्थी कसे पभमांजपी कसे रूप मम भमरपीदमरही रमर्फ मम हहसससे कसे रूप मम दशमर्फयम जमयसेरम।

एफ) यह कक, प्रतयरर्थीययों ककी सरर क्रमममांक 171/23 कक रकबम 0.1882 हसेकक्‍टर, 174/4/2 कक रकबम 0.2254 हसेकक्‍टर, 175/1/3 कक रकबम 0.3719 हसेकक्‍टर ककी ककल रकबम 0.7855 हसेकक्‍टर अरमर्फक्‍त 84500 सकरसेयरकरक्‍ट भमरपीदमरही रमर्फ मम जमम ककयम जमरसेरम शसेष अनय प्रतयरर्थीययों कक सरर क्रमममांक ककी भभमम समझझौक्‍तसे ससे पर क क रहसेरपी।

जब) यह कक, अपपीलमरर्थी दरमरम उकक्‍त अनकबमांध हदनममांक 02.06.2014 कसे पमांजपीयन कसे मलए सक्‍टममांप डयभक्‍टही रूपयसे 12,41,220/- (बमरह लमख इकक्‍तमलहीस हजमर दरो सझौ बपीस रूपयसे) कम भकरक्‍तमन हदनममांक 22.09.2020 करो रजजससमर कमयमर्फलय मम ककयम रयम रम, जजससे आरसे उकक्‍त भमरपीदमरही रमर्फ कसे पमांजपीयन मम सक्‍टममांप डयभक्‍टही कसे मद मम उकक्‍त रममश करो सममयरोजजक्‍त कर भमरपीदमरही पमांजपीयन ककयम जमरसेरम।

एच) यह कक, उकक्‍त समझझौक्‍तसे कसे अमांक्‍तरर्फक्‍त आज हदनममांक कसे पशचमक्‍त सभपी पकयों कसे मधय ककसपी भपी प्रकमर कम करोई वररमद शसेष नहहीमां हहै।"

10. The impugned judgment and decree dated 22.02.2023 passed in Civil Suit No. 300042-A/2015 by the Principal District Judge, Ratlam is set aside. A decree be drawn accordingly. A copy of compromise petition shall form part of the decree.

11. The first appeal is disposed off accordingly. The record of the trial Court be remitted alongwith a copy of this order.

C.C. as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE sh/-

SEHAR Digitally signed by SEHAR HASEEN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH INDORE, ou=BENCH AT INDORE,

HASEE 2.5.4.20=900ec6fc757798eaeb3df7a 32860bd3298415a4d1c2d91436213 f2568c8f27da, postalCode=452001, st=Madhya Pradesh, serialNumber=E7DBBA955B262C04 B8413251CE7FB6F0B7DBA610C57F

N 1559C08BF6C6F5DD40D4, cn=SEHAR HASEEN Date: 2025.08.22 19:01:50 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter