Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahaveer Jain vs Sumitra Bai
2025 Latest Caselaw 6358 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6358 MP
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Mahaveer Jain vs Sumitra Bai on 21 August, 2025

Author: Hirdesh
Bench: Hirdesh
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:18492




                                                               1                               MP-4898-2024
                              IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT GWALIOR
                                                          BEFORE
                                                HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH
                                                  ON THE 21st OF AUGUST, 2025
                                                 MISC. PETITION No. 4898 of 2024
                                                 MAHAVEER JAIN AND OTHERS
                                                           Versus
                                                  SUMITRA BAI AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                   Shri Anuraj Saxena- Advocate for petittioners.

                                                                   ORDER

This misc. petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by petitioners/plaintiffs being aggrieved by the order dated 14/08/2024(Annexure P-1) passed in RCSA No.58/2022 by First Civil Judge, Senior Division, Khaniyadana, District Shivpuri whereby trial Court has rejected the application under Order 7 Rule 14 read with Section 151 of CPC for taking documents on record filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs.

2. It is submissions of the petitioners that the petitioners filed a civil suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction against the

respondents/defendants in respect of suit land which the petitioners claimed to have purchased via registered sale deed. Thereafter, counsel for respondents/defendants filed their written statements before the Trial Court and denied all averments. During trial, petitioners moved an application under Order 7 Rule 14 read with Section 151 of CPC for taking documents on record.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:18492

2 MP-4898-2024

3. It is further submitted that the trial Court after hearing both the parties, rejected the application filed by petitioners on the ground that no specific ground has been mentioned by the petitioners in the application that, why the documents have not been produced before commencement of a trial and no reason has been given by the petitioners in the application that why these documents were filed after a long delay.

4. Being aggrieved by the impugned order, counsel for petitioners filed this petition and submitted that the impugned order passed by trial Court is contrary to law and deserves to be set aside. Learned trial Court has committed error in rejection of the application on the ground of delay. Hence, prayed for setting aside the impugned order.

5. Learned counsel for respondents supported the impugned order and prays for rejection of this petition.

6. Heard counsel for the both the parties and perused the entire documents produced with this petition.

7. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of Manoj Gupta Vs. Sharma Advertising reported in 2025 (1) MPLJ 610 held as under:-

Procedure is handmaid of justice. Procedural and technical hurdles shall not be allowed to come in a way of Court while doing substantial justice, if procedural violation does not seriously cause prejudice to adversary party, Court must lean towards doing substantial justice rather than relying upon procedural and technical violation.

8. In the present case, trial Court has rejected the application only on the ground of delay and it is clear that suit is at initial stage and petitioners' evidence was not commenced and documents filed are alleged to be certified copy of the sale deed therefore, merely on the ground of delay, trial Court

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:18492

3 MP-4898-2024

has rejected the application under Order 7 Rule 14 of CPC read with Section 151 of CPC which is incorrect in the eye of law and accordingly impugned order dated 14/08/2024 is hereby set-aside.

9. This Court, in the light of the aforesaid judgment, holds that the present application under Order 7 Rule 14 of CPC read with Section 151 of the CPC deserves to be and is hereby allowed and Trial Court is directed to place on record the documents which are alongwith application filed by the petitioner.

10. A liberty is granted to respondents/defendants to rebut plaintiff's evidence in trial and the learned trial Court is directed to proceed further with the case in accordance with law on the basis of evidence of both parties, which would come on record.

11. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is allowed and disposed of.

(HIRDESH) JUDGE

Prachi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter