Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vivek vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 8236 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8236 MP
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Vivek vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 April, 2025

Author: Anand Pathak
Bench: Anand Pathak
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                         AT GWALIOR
                      CRA NO. 6179 OF 2024
              (VIVEK AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF M.P.)

Dated: 22.04.2025
      Shri Rajeev Upadhyay and Shri Pratik Kulshreshtha -
Advocates for appellant No.4 - Raghvendra.
      Shri D.S. Kushwaha- Additional Advocate General for the
respondent/State.

Shri Rajmani Bansal -Advocate for the complainant. Heard on I.A.No.6025/2025, an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail on behalf of appellant No.4 - Raghvendra.

This criminal appeal assails the judgment dated 30-04-2024 passed in S.T.No.228/2020 by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Sabalgarh District Morena whereby appellant No.4 has been convicted as under:

    Section             Imprisonment                     Fine
307 of IPC         10 years' imprisonment     Rs.5,000/-        with
                                              default stipulation.

It is the submission of learned counsel for appellant No.4 that trial Court erred in convicting and awarding jail sentence to appellant No.4. Appellant No.4 already suffered around 1 year 9 months incarceration as pre and post trial detention. So far as allegation against the present appellant Raghvendra is concerned he inflicted Farsa blow to Veer Singh (PW-4) and it is the specific allegation of Veer Singh that Manoj also inflicted Farsa blow initially thereafter present appellant. Only single injury over the IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR CRA NO. 6179 OF 2024 (VIVEK AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF M.P.)

head was sustained by the injured witness Veer Singh and no fracture was found. Therefore, it was a simple injury, hence allegations are doubtful against the present appellant - Raghvendra qua Veer Singh. Appellant has good case on merits and hearing of appeal would take some time. Appellant voluntarily undertakes to perform community service to purge his misdeed, if any and to serve National /Environmental/Social cause. Thus, prayed for grant of suspension of sentence.

Learned counsel for the State as well as complainant opposed the application and prayed for its dismissal.

Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, this Court intends to allow the application for suspension of sentence (I.A.No.6025/2025).

If appellant No.4 furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) along with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court that he shall appear before the Principal Registrar of this Court on 21-08-2025 and on all other subsequent dates as may be fixed by the Office for appearance, then he shall be released on bail and execution of jail sentence is suspended till disposal of this appeal, subject to deposit of fine amount.

Appellant No.4 shall not be source of embarrassment and IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR CRA NO. 6179 OF 2024 (VIVEK AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF M.P.)

harassment to the complainant in any manner and he shall not move in their vicinity.

It is made clear that this order of suspension of sentence is granted once the case is made out and thereafter, direction for plantation of saplings is given and it is not the case where a person intends to serve social cause can be given bail without considering the merits.

,rn~ }kjk ;g funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkosnd 10 ikS/kksa dk ¼;FkklaHko dksbZ Hkh Qy nsus okys isM+ vFkok uhe@ihiy tSls isM+½ jksi.k djsxk rFkk mls vius vkl iM+ksl esa isM+ksa dh lqj{kk dh O;oLFkk djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/ks lqjf{kr jg ldsA vkosnd dk ;g drZO; gS fd u dsoy ikS/kksa dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa iks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A ^^o`{kkjksi.k ds lkFk] o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA^^ vkosnd laHkor% 6&8 QhV ÅWaps ikS/ks@isM+ksa dks 3&4 QhV xM~<k djds yxk;sxk rkfd os 'kh?kz gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus ds fy,] vkosnd dks fjgk fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k o`{kksas@ikS/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh QksVks çLrqr djuk gksxsaA rRi'pkr~] fopkj.k ds lekiu rd gj rhu eghus esa vkosnd ds }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izxfr fjiksVZ çLrqr dh tk,xh A o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk drZO; gS D;ksafd i;kZoj.k {kj.k ds dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky; vuqikyu ds ckjs esa vkosnd }kjk fn[kkbZ xbZ fdlh Hkh ykijokgh dks utj IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR CRA NO. 6179 OF 2024 (VIVEK AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF M.P.)

vankt ugh dj ldrk gSA blfy, vkosnd dks isM+ksa dh çxfr vkSj vkosndx.k }kjk vuqikyu ds lac/a k esa ,d fjiksVZ çLrqr djus ds fy, funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkonsd }kjk fd;s x;s vuqikyu dh ,d la{kfIr fjiskVZ bl U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rhu ekg esa ¼vxys N% eghuksa ds fy,½ j[kh tk;sxh ftls fd ^^funsZ'k^^ 'kh"kZ ds varxZr j[kk tk,xkA o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosndx.k dh vksj ls dh xbZ dksbZ Hkh pwd vkosnd dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh gSA vkosnd dks viuh ilan ds LFkku ij bu ikS/kksa@isMksa dks jksius dh Lora=rk gksxh] ;fn og bu jksis x;s isMksa dh Vªh xkMZ ;k ckM+ yxkdj j{kk djuk pkgrk gS] rks og vius Loa; ds O;; ij ;g djus ds fy;s Lora= gksxkA bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g funsZ'k ,d ijh{k.k izdj.k ds rkSj ij fn, x, gSa rkfd fgalk vkSj cqjkbZ ds fopkj dk izfrdkj] l`tu ,oa izd`fr ds lkFk ,dkdkj gksus ds ek/;e ls lkeaktL; LFkkfir fd;k tk ldsA orZeku esa ekuo vfLrRo ds vko';d vax ds :i esa n;k] lsok] izse ,oaa d:a.kk dh izd`fr dks fodflr djus dh vko';drk gS D;ksafd ;g ekuo thou dh ewyHkwr izo`fr;ka gSa vkSj ekuo vfLrRo dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, budk iquthZfor gksuk vko';d gSA ^^;g iz;kl dsoy ,d o`{k ds jksi.k dk iz'u u gksdj cfYd ,d fopkj ds vadqj.k dk gSA^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR CRA NO. 6179 OF 2024 (VIVEK AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF M.P.)

;g funsZ'k vkosnd ds }kjk Lor% O;Dr dh xbZ lkeqnkf;d lsok dh bPNk ds dkj.k fn;k x;k gS tks LoSfPNd gSA It is expected from appellant that he shall submit photographs by downloading the mobile application (NISARG App) prepared at the instance of High Court for monitoring the plantation through satellite/Geo-Tagging.

Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for information and necessary compliance.

Certified copy as per rules.

                              (ANAND PATHAK)                                              (HIRDESH)
                                  Judge                                                      Judge
 Anil*



ANIL KUMAR

             DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA
             PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT
             OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR,


CHAURASIY

2.5.4.20=8512f40a1a9eaa50b6802d068b51dae 27e84c266b09d283f0799e67cdc7df50f, postalCode=474001, st=Madhya Pradesh, serialNumber=EC534CBB3B245F050119F06F4

A A296DD83C765A1E2ACC6EC7D8BD8CBCC9C2 446E, cn=ANIL KUMAR CHAURASIYA Date: 2025.04.23 11:09:57 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter