Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Susheela Mahor vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 7714 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7714 MP
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Smt Susheela Mahor vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 April, 2025

Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
Bench: G. S. Ahluwalia
           NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:8161




                                                            1                              WP-4184-2024
                            IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                  AT GWALIOR
                                                        BEFORE
                                         HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA
                                                  ON THE 8 th OF APRIL, 2025
                                               WRIT PETITION No. 4184 of 2024
                                              SMT SUSHEELA MAHOR
                                                     Versus
                                    THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                         Appearance:
                                 Shri Tajuddin Khan - Advocate for the petitioner.

                                 Shri S. S. Kushwaha - Government Advocate for the State.

                                                                ORDER

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by petitioners seeking the following reliefs:-

(i) That, the impugned order annexure P-2 dated 22-11-2017 may kindly be quashed and the respondents may kindly be ordered and directed to grant the benefit of minimum pay scale and arrears from the respective dates of classification of her late husband of the petitioner.

(ii) That, any other, order/direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner.

2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that husband of petitioner had expired on 27/08/2023. The husband of petitioner was classified as a Labrour by order passed in the month of July, 2006. However, he has not been given the benefit of minimum of regular pay-scale from the order of his classification till the conferral of status of Sthaikarmi. It is submitted that

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:8161

2 WP-4184-2024 earlier the husband of petitioner had filed W.P.No.7044/2015, which was disposed of by order dated 14/10/2015 with a direction to respondents to decide the representation. It is submitted that on 22/11/2017, the representation has been decided in the light of Viniyamatikaran scheme dated 07/10/2016 whereas the case of petitioner is that the husband of petitioner is entitled for minimum of pay-scale from the date of order of classification till the conferral of status Sthaikarmi. Sthaikarmi and classified employees are two different categories and they cannot be clubbed together.

3. So far as the delay in filing of this petition is concerned, it is submitted by counsel for petitioner that the Water Resources Department as well as P.W.D. by passing separate orders, has decided to pay the minimum of regular pay-scale to employees or to dependents of the employees in accordance with judgment

passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat Vs. Ashwini Ray reported in 2017 (Vol 3) SCC 436 . Thus, it is submitted that the delay can be ignored specifically when the State Government itself had decided to pay the minimum of regular pay-scale to the employees in the light of Ram Naresh Rawat (supra). It is further submitted that even otherwise in service matters, the delay and latches are not relevant criteria.

4. Per contra, the petition is vehemently opposed by counsel for State. It is submitted that claim of husband of petitioner was rejected on 22/11/2017 and the present petition has been filed after seven long years without any explanation for the delay.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

6. The Water Resources Department by its circular dated 16.10.2024 has held that the minimum of regular pay-scale shall be paid to all the

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:8161

3 WP-4184-2024 employees. Thus, once State Government itself has decided to pay the minimum of regular pay-scale to all the classified employees, then the delay cannot a criteria to deny the benefit which had already accrued in favour of husband of petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this petition is allowed with a direction to respondents to consider the representation of petitioner afresh and if the order of classification of husband of petitioner is still intact, then the minimum of regular pay-scale from the date of order of classification till the conferral of status of Sthaikarmi shall be paid to petitioner.

8. Let the entire exercise be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of fresh representation.

9. With aforesaid observation, the petition is finally disposed of.

(G. S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE

PjS/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter