Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13998 MP
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
ON THE 13 th OF MAY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 12865 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
SMT. ALOP BAI W/O LATE SHRI UTTAM SINGH, AGED
ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSE WIFE
RESIDENT OF H NO 14 SESADABAR TEHSIL
GADARWARA DISTRICT NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI ABHISHEK KUMAR MISHRA - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
COLLECTOR DISTRICT NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE)
G A D A R W A R A DISTRICT NARSINGHPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JILA PANCHAYAT,
N A R S I N G H P U R DISTRICT NARSINGHPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JANPAD
PANCHAYAT BABAI CHICHLI DISTRICT
NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
seeking the following reliefs :-
(i) To issue a writ in the nature of nature of mandamus by directing the respondent no.2 to decide the application dated 22.11.2023 within a period of one month.
(ii) To grant any other relief, which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including cost of the litigation in favour of the petitioner.
(iii) Cost of the petition.
2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that the petitioner has filed an appeal on 22.11.2023 but the respondent no.4 has not decided the appeal so far and accordingly, it is prayed that the respondent no.2 be directed to decide the
appeal as early as possible.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. The petitioner has not filed the copy of the ordersheets to show any lethargic attitude on part of the respondent no.2. Even otherwise, in the light of judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of U.P. and Others decided on 29.02.2024 in Criminal Appeal No.3589/2023, the Constitutional Courts should not fix the outer limits merely because one party has resources to approach the higher Court.
5. Since no reasonable time has lapsed to draw an inference against the Presiding Officer, this Court is of considered opinion that at present no case is made out warranting interference in the matter.
6. The petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
(G.S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE TG /-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!