Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6426 MP
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMA
ON THE 1 st OF MARCH, 2024
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1608 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
ASHUTOSH S/O SURYANARAYAN VYAS, AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O 6 ROYAL GALARY
BUILDING PLOT NO. 22-30 NEAR SAYAJI HOTEL
SCHEME NO. 54 INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
( NONE FOR THE PETITIONER )
AND
GAJENDRA SINGH S/O DATAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 44
YEAR S , OCCUPATION: PROPERTY DEALER R/O 141
DEENDAYAL NAGAR RATLAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
( BY SHRI GAURAV PANCHAL - ADVOCATE )
This revision coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
The petitioner has filed present revision under section 397 read with section 401 of Cr.P.C against the impugned judgment dated 06/04/2023 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ratlam in Criminal Appeal no. 223/2022 by upholding the judgment dated 02/12/2022 passed by JMFC, Ratlam in Criminal Case no. 422/2014, whereby the petitioner/accused has been convicted under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981 ( hereinafter referred to "N.I. Act") and sentenced to undergo six months R.I with the direction to pay compensation of Rs. 3,98,200/- to the complainant with usual default stipulation.
2/ During pendancy of this revision, both the parties have filed joint compromise petition (IA no. 2154/2024) for compromise. The factum of compromise has been duly verified by the Principal Registrar of this Court on 26/02/2024 and as per his report, both the parties are competent to compromise the matter having entered into compromise with their sweet-will, without undue influence, pressure, force, duress or coercion 3/ Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the matter has been compromise between both the parties, therefore, the impugned judgment passed by both the Courts below be set aside and the petitioner/accused be acquitted from the offence.
4/ The alleged offence is compoundable, therefore, in view of the compromise arrived at between both the parties, present revision is allowed and the impugned judgment dated 06/04/2023 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ratlam in Criminal Appeal no. 223/2022 as well as the judgment dated 02/12/2022 passed by JMFC, Ratlam in Criminal Case no. 422/2014 are hereby set aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the offence under section 138 of N.I. Act.
5/ In view of the compromise between both the parties, the trial Court is directed to release the amount of compensation of Rs. 2,12,500/- deposited by the petitioner, in favour of the complainant.
6/ Present revision stands disposed of accordingly. CC as per rules.
(ANIL VERMA) JUDGE amol
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!