Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arvind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 21571 MP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21571 MP
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Arvind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 August, 2024

Author: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari

Bench: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari

                                                             1                             CRA-15254-2023
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                     AT INDORE
                                                      CRA No. 15254 of 2023
                                          (ARVIND AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )



                           Dated : 08-08-2024
                                 Shri Kushal Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant(s).
                                 Shri Kamal Kumar Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
                           respondent/State.

Shri Bharat Singh Gome, learned counsel for the respondent [OBJ].

Heard on I.A.No.11638/2024, which is second application under

Section 389 of the Cr.P.C for suspension of sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of appellant - No.2 Madanlal son of Nanga Prasad Gome.

2. Appellant No.2 stands convicted vide judgment dated 10.10.2023, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Indore(M.P.) in Sessions Trial/Case No.1600815/2015 and sentenced under Section 307 of IPC for 4 years RI with fine of Rs.3,500/- and under Section 323 of IPC sentenced to 6 months RI with fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulations.

3. The First application of the appellant was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 12.03.2024 with liberty to file afresh after completion of

one year custody period.

4. The prosecution case found to be proved is that on 05.05.2015 complainant Ramniwas Gome lodged a report to this effect that he lives in Nehru Nagar, Indore and his brother Madanlal and his wife and son also stay with him in the same house. It is further alleged that the daughter of the complainant started her boutique in the house itself. On this, his younger

2 CRA-15254-2023 brother Madanlal(appellant No.2) and his son Arvind used to quarrel with complainant's daughter and his wife. Thereafter, when the complainant and his son Bharat Gome went to Court to lodge a complaint to this effect and while returning at about 03.20 PM, accused Madanlal and his son Arvind started abusing them. When complainant and his son resisted, accused Madanlal caused injury to complainant's wife on her hand by means of Iron rod(Saria). Thereafter, Arvind caused injury to Bharat on his neck, chest, hand and various part of his body by means of knife and blood was oozing out. Accordingly, a case has been registered against the present appellant.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant No.2 is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the alleged offence. There are material contradictions and omissions in the statement of prosecution

witnesses. He further submitted that the previous application of the appellant no.2 was dismissed with liberty to file afresh after completion of one year custody. Out of 4 years, now the appellant has completed one year jail sentence. He further submits that the appeal is of the year of the year 2023 and its final disposal will likely to take considerable long time. In these circumstances, prayer is made to release the appellant on bail.

6. Learned Government Advocate for the State as well as learned counsel for the objector has opposed the prayer and submitted that looking to the crime committed by the present appellant which is heinous in nature, no case for suspension of sentence is made out.

7. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and material evidence available on record, coupled with the fact that final hearing

3 CRA-15254-2023 of this appeal is not possible in near future, without commenting on the merits of the case, I.A. No.11638/2024 is allowed. It is directed that upon depositing the fine amount (if not already deposited) and on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court, the substantive jail sentence of the appellant - No.2 Madanlal son of Nanga Prasad Gome, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he shall be released on bail. He shall appear before the concerned trial Court firstly on 20.11.2024 and on all other subsequent dates, as may be fixed in this behalf by that Court.

I.A.No.11638/2024 stands disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.





                           (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI)                  (DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA)
                                     JUDGE                                           JUDGE


                           pn









 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter