Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21455 MP
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2024
1 WP-22505-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA
ON THE 7 th OF AUGUST, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 22505 of 2024
PREM NARAYAN UDENIYA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Yash Nagar, learned counsel for the Petitioner .
Shri Bhuwan Gautam, Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.
ORDER
Per: Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari
1. The petitioner has approached this court by way of this petition claiming the
benefit of annual increment w.e.f. 1 st July 2015 along with arrears and interest. The petitioner retired from service on 30.06.2015 and all the terminal benefits were given to him by the respondents. Now he is claiming the annual increment w.e.f. 1st of July of that year, in light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court of India in the case of The
Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P.Mundinamani & Ors. reported in 2023
SCC OnLine SC 401, whereby the benefit of annual increment fell due on 1st July of every
year has been directed to be given to all the Government employees who retired on 30th June of the relevant year.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner is also entitled to get the said benefit of the annual increment which became payable to him on 1st July with arrears and interest.
3. The learned State counsel appearing for the respondents/State is not disputing the
2 WP-22505-2024 entitlement of the petitioner for the grant of annual increment w.e.f. 01.07.2015 but objects to the payment of arrears and interest from 2015 as there is huge delay in filling the Writ Petition before this court. Learned State counsel has placed reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Rushibhai Jagdishbhai Pathak Vs. Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation [2022 SCC OnLine SC 641] in which the arrears and interest for three years before the date of filing of the Writ Petition has been granted to the writ petitioner due to approaching the High Court with the delay.
4. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the rival parties and taking note of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of C.P. Mundinamani and Rushibhai Jagdishbhai Pathak (supra), this petition is allowed, by directing the respondents to grant the benefit of annual increment which was to be added with effect from 01.07.2015 and recalculate the benefit of retiral dues and pension and issue fresh PPO in favour of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of submitting copy of this order. The petitioner shall be entitled to arrears with interest only for three years before the date of
filing of the writ petition.
5. With the aforesaid, the petition stands allowed to the extent indicated above.
(SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI) (DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA)
JUDGE JUDGE
sh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!