Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raghuraj Singh Parmar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 17138 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 17138 MP
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Raghuraj Singh Parmar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 October, 2023
Author: Milind Ramesh Phadke
                                                     1
                 IN         THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                           AT GWALIOR
                                              BEFORE
                            HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
                                       ON THE 13 th OF OCTOBER, 2023
                                       WRIT PETITION No. 26523 of 2023

               BETWEEN:-
               RAGHURAJ SINGH PARMAR S/O SHRI MOHAR MAN
               SINGH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETD.
               DRIVER PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT DIVISION
               MORENA R/O GOPALPURA MORENA (MADHYA
               PRADESH)

                                                                                .....PETITIONER
               (BY SHRI ALOK BANDHU SHRIVASTAVA- ADVOCATE)

               AND
               1.          THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
                           PRINCIPAL   SECRETARY   PUBLIC   WORKS
                           DEPARTMENT,     MANTRALAYA,    VALLABH
                           BHAWAN,   DISTRICT    BHOPAL   (MADHYA
                           PRADESH)

               2.          ENGINEER  IN   CHIEF,  PUBLIC   WORKS
                           DEPARTMENT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

               3.          CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
                           GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)

               4.          EXECUTIVE  ENGINEER,  PUBLIC   WORKS
                           DEPARTMENT MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)

               5.          DISTRICT PENSION OFFICER, DISTRICT PENSION
                           OFFICE, MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                             .....RESPONDENTS

(BY SHRI S.S.KUSHWAH- GOVT. ADVOCATE)

This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the Signature Not Verified following:

Signed by: MADHU
SOODAN PRASAD
Signing time: 13-10-2023
05:57:38 PM                                           ORDER

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the inaction/order of the respondents, whereby the claim of petitioner for encahsment of the earned leave has been rejected on the ground that he is a retired work charged employee and not entitled to leave encahsment.

Petitioner has placed reliance on the decision rendered in W.A. No.470/2012 (The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ram Khilawan Singh), preferred by the State of M.P. against the order dated 29.06.2011 passed in W.P. No.9930/2011.

Petitioner has also relied on Rule 4 of M.P. Work Charged and

Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977 (in short '1977 Rules'). The Division Bench in the case of Ram Khilawan Singh (supra) has considered the identical issue raised therein, wherein the single Judge has allowed the petition preferred by a contingency paid employee and held him entitled for leave encahsment of 240 days. This order was modified by the Division Bench in view of the admission of the State Government and Rule 4 of 1977 Rules which provides that an employee working under the work charged establishment is entitled for the benefit of encahsment of 120 days earned leave.

Per contra, the petition is vehemently opposed by the counsel for the State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In view of the fact that the issue in the present case is identical to the case of Ram Khilawan Singh (supra) and the said judgment is squarely applicable to the present case also, this petition is allowed. The respondents are directed Signature Not Verified Signed by: MADHU SOODAN PRASAD to extend the benefit of encashment of 120 days of earned leave to the petitioner Signing time: 13-10-2023 05:57:38 PM as admissible under 1977 Rules within a period of 90 days from the date of

production of certified copy of the order passed today.

With the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.

(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE ms/-

Signature Not Verified Signed by: MADHU SOODAN PRASAD Signing time: 13-10-2023 05:57:38 PM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter