Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7576 MP
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 9 th OF MAY, 2023
MISC. PETITION No. 4361 of 2021
BETWEEN:-
1. IMRAT KUSHWAHA S/O LATE SHRI BALIRAM
KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: FARMER BEHIND NEW GALLA
MANDI INDRA WARD GADARWARA DISTT.
NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. INDRAJEET KUSHWAHA (DEAD) THR. LRS. SMT.
NIMA KUSHWAHA W/O LATE SHRI INDRAJEET
KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, BEHIND
NEW GALLA MANDI INDRA WARD GADARWARA
DISTT. NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. RAM KRISHNA KUSWAHA S/O LATE SHRI
INDRAJEET, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: FARMER BEHIND NEW GALLA
MANDI INDRA WARD GADARWARA DISTT.
NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. RAM MANOHAR S/O LATE SHRI INDRAJEET
KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: FARMER BEHIND NEW GALLA
MANDI INDRA WARD GADARWARA DISTT.
NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. DURGA PRASAD KUSHWAHA S/O LATE SHRI
BALIRAM KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: FARMER VBEHIND NEW GALLA
MANDI INDRA WARD GADARWARA DISTT.
NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI SAKET MALIK - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SMT. HARI BAI KUSHWAHA W/O LATE SHRI
RAVIPRAKASH @ RAKESH KUSHWAHA BAI
KHERMAI TEHSIL AND DISTT. JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2
2. SMT. BHUJIYA BAI W/O SHRI MUNNALAL
K U S H WA H A VILLAGE KATTOHIYA TEH.
TENDUKHEDA (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. SMT. KATTO BAI W/O SHRI LALJI KUSHWAHA
SABJI MANDI BAHRELI TEH. BARELI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. SMT. KUSUM BAI W/O SRI TARACHAND
JANAKPUR TEH. BARELI (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. SMT. MANKUNWAR BAI W/O SHRI RAJKUMAR
PAT E L H.NO. 228 BARARU TEH. AND DISTT.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
6. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER DIVISIONAL
DIVISION JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Petitioners have filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 23.11.2021 (Annexure-P/14) by which application for grant of interim relief has been dismissed.
2. Petitioners have already preferred an appeal before appellate authority. In view of judgment of Apex Court reported in (2009) 16 SCC 766, Delhi Gate Auto Service Station and others vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Agra through Senior Divisional Manager and others, petition is not maintainable, therefore, same is dismissed.
3. Petitioners are at liberty to prosecute pending appeal and same shall be considered expeditiously. Appellate authority will not be influenced by order of dismissal of the miscellaneous petition.
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE shabana Digitally signed by SHABANA ANSARI Date: 2023.05.09 15:15:59 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!